Biotic and abiotic changes along the recovery gradient of two impounded rivers with different impoundment use

被引:37
作者
Camargo, JA [1 ]
Voelz, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Ctr Ciencias Medioambientales, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
关键词
biotic and abiotic components; downstream changes; impounded rivers;
D O I
10.1023/A:1005712024049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Changes in physicochemical conditions and lotic benthic macroinvertebrates along the recovery gradient of the impounded Colorado (USA) and Duraton (Spain) Rivers were examined to identify and compare major factors affecting the structure of the macrobenthic community. Although both impounded rivers were exposed to hypolimnial releases from dams, they exhibited different impoundment use; Granby Dam (Colorado River) is used for water storage whereas Burgomillodo Dam (Duraton River) is used for hydroelectric production. The major factor responsible for macroinvertebrate responses in the Colorado River appeared to be the anomalous temperature pattern caused by Granby Dam, with relatively cool temperatures during the summer and relatively warm temperatures during the winter. In contrast, the major factors responsible for macroinvertebrate responses in the Duraton River seemed to be short-term flow fluctuations and low oxygen concentrations caused by Burgomillodo Dam. Values of taxonomic richness and relative abundances of shredders (Colorado River) and scrapers (Duraton River) increased along the recovery gradient of the impounded rivers. In general, chironomids (Diptera) were tolerant to both types of impoundment use, whereas elmids (Coleoptera) and psychomyiids (Trichoptera) were very sensitive. Overall, this environmental monitoring study denotes that the downstream changes in the biotic and abiotic components of impounded rivers is a function of the particular use of impoundments.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 158
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Alabaster J.S., 1980, WATER QUALITY CRITER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V21
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, STAND AQ TOX HAZ EV
[5]  
BOON P J, 1988, Regulated Rivers Research and Management, V2, P389, DOI 10.1002/rrr.3450020314
[6]  
BRITTAIN J E, 1989, Regulated Rivers Research and Management, V3, P191, DOI 10.1002/rrr.3450030119
[7]   Spatiotemporal variations in species diversity to assess environmental impacts on aquatic communities: The use of biomass data versus density data [J].
Camargo, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1996, 40 (02) :125-136
[8]   STRUCTURAL AND TROPHIC CHANGES IN A RIVERINE MACROBENTHIC COMMUNITY FOLLOWING IMPOUNDMENT FOR HYDROELECTRIC POWER-GENERATION [J].
CAMARGO, JA ;
DEJALON, DG .
JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 1995, 10 (04) :311-317
[9]  
CRAIG JF, 1987, ADV ECOLOGY
[10]   DOWNSTREAM EFFECTS OF A NEW HYDROPOWER IMPOUNDMENT ON MACROPHYTE, MACROINVERTEBRATE AND FISH COMMUNITIES [J].
DEJALON, DG ;
SANCHEZ, P .
REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1994, 9 (04) :253-261