Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED

被引:27
作者
Fosnocht, DE [1 ]
Chapman, CR
Swanson, ER
Donaldson, GW
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2004.09.024
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate the validity of change in visual analog Scale. (VAS) as a measure of pain relief using a verbal descriptor Scale (VDS) of change in pain. Methods. A prospective observational study of emergency department patients measured pain with VAS and recorded verbal report of change in pain. Results. One thousand four hundred,ninety patients yielded 1999 comparisons between change in VAS and,VDS. Correlation of change in VAS and VDS of change in pain was p = 0.667 (P <.001). A wide range of change in VAS, large standard deviations for the mean change in VAS, and discordance in the direction of change in VAS were present within each verbal descriptor category. Conclusions. Change in VAS is moderately correlated with a VDS of change in pain. Wide variability in change in VAS and discordance with a VDS demonstrate that change in VAS is not a valid indicator of pain relief for individual patients. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PAIN MEASUREMENT MAN
[2]   Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales [J].
Bergh, I ;
Sjöström, B ;
Odén, A ;
Steen, B .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (05) :355-361
[3]   Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain [J].
Bijur, PE ;
Silver, W ;
Gallagher, EJ .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (12) :1153-1157
[4]   Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale [J].
Bird, SB ;
Dickson, EW .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) :639-643
[5]  
CHAPMAN CR, 2001, BONICAS MANAGEMENT P, P210
[6]   Empirical comparison of commonly used measures to evaluate pain treatment in cancer patients with chronic pain [J].
de Wit, R ;
van Dam, F ;
Abu-Saad, HH ;
Loonstra, S ;
Zandbelt, L ;
van Buuren, A ;
van der Heijden, K ;
Leenhouts, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (04) :1280-1287
[7]   Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED [J].
Gallagher, EJ ;
Bijur, PE ;
Latimer, C ;
Silver, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 20 (04) :287-290
[8]   Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale [J].
Gallagher, EJ ;
Liebman, M ;
Bijur, PE .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) :633-638
[9]   The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain [J].
Kelly, AM .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (03) :205-207
[10]   Do quantitative changes in pain intensity correlate with pain relief and satisfaction? [J].
Stahmer, SA ;
Shofer, FS ;
Marino, A ;
Shepherd, S ;
Abbuhl, S .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (09) :851-857