ROC-based assessments of 3D cortical surface-matching algorithms

被引:41
作者
Bansal, R
Staib, LH
Whiteman, R
Wang, YMM
Peterson, BS
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Elect Engn, New Haven, CT 06512 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06512 USA
关键词
curvature; fluid flow; geodesic; partial differential equations; ROC;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.054
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Algorithms for the semi-automated analysis of, brain surfaces have recently received considerable attention, and yet, they rarely receive a rigorous assessment of their performance. We present a method for the quantitative assessment of performance across differing surface analysis algorithms and across various modifications of a single algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of an algorithm for detecting known deformations added synthetically to the brains being studied are assessed using curves for Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC). We also present a method for the isolation of sources of variance in MRI data sets that can contribute to degradation in performance of surface-matching algorithms. Isolation of these sources of variance allows determination of whether degradation in performance of surface-matching algorithms derives primarily from errors in registration of brains to a common coordinate space, from errors in placement of the known deformation, or from interindividual or between-group variability in morphology of the cortical surface. We apply these methods to the study of surface-matching algorithms that are based on fluid flow (FF) deformation, geodesic (GD) interpolation, or nearest neighbor (NN) proximity. We show that the performances of surface-matching algorithms depend on the presence of interindividual and between-group variability in the surfaces surrounding the cortical deformation. We also show that, in general, the FF algorithm performs as well as or better than the GD and NN algorithms. The large variance in identifying point correspondences across brain surfaces using the GD and the NN algorithms suggests strongly that these point correspondences are less valid than those determined by the FIT algorithm. The GD and NN algorithms, moreover, are both vulnerable to detecting false-positive activations at points of high curvature, particularly along large fissures, cisterns, and cortical sulci. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 162
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   AREA ABOVE ORDINAL DOMINANCE GRAPH AND AREA BELOW RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC GRAPH [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (04) :387-415
[2]  
Boothby W. M., 1986, INTRO DIFFERENTIAL M
[3]   Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy [J].
Christensen, GE ;
Joshi, SC ;
Miller, MI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (06) :864-877
[4]  
Duda R. O., 2000, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI
[5]  
Egan JP., 1975, Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis
[6]   Modeling brain deformations in Alzheimer disease by fluid registration of serial 3D MR images [J].
Freeborough, PA ;
Fox, NC .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (05) :838-843
[7]   HUMAN BRAIN - LEFT-RIGHT ASYMMETRIES IN TEMPORAL SPEECH REGION [J].
GESCHWIND, N ;
LEVITSKY, W .
SCIENCE, 1968, 161 (3837) :186-+
[8]   SELECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AND PROCEDURES - PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS [J].
GRINER, PF ;
MAYEWSKI, RJ ;
MUSHLIN, AI ;
GREENLAND, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 94 (04) :553-+
[9]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[10]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36