Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis

被引:422
作者
Leray, Emmanuelle [1 ,2 ]
Yaouanq, Jacqueline [1 ,3 ]
Le Page, Emmanuelle [3 ]
Coustans, Marc [3 ]
Laplaud, David [3 ]
Oger, Joel [3 ,4 ]
Edan, Gilles [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CHU, Serv Epidemiol & Sante Publ, F-35033 Rennes, France
[2] CHU, INSERM, CIC P 0203, F-35033 Rennes, France
[3] CHU, Serv Neurol, F-35033 Rennes, France
[4] Univ British Columbia, Multiple Sclerosis Clin, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Univ Rennes 1, Fac Med, UEB, F-35033 Rennes, France
关键词
multiple sclerosis; disability progression; prognosis; course; age; NATURAL-HISTORY; INTERFERON BETA-1B; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; RELAPSES; AGE; MS; PREDICTORS; LESIONS; ONSET;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awq076
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is well documented that disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis is correlated with axonal injury and that the extent of axonal injury is correlated with the degree of inflammation. However, the interdependence between focal inflammation, diffuse inflammation and neurodegeneration, and their relative contribution to clinical deficits, remains ambiguous. A hypothesis might be that early focal inflammation could be the pivotal event from which all else follows, suggesting the consideration of multiple sclerosis as a two-stage disease. This prompted us to define two phases in the disease course of multiple sclerosis by using two scores on the Kurtzke Disability Status Scale as benchmarks of disability accumulation: an early phase, 'Phase 1', from multiple sclerosis clinical onset to irreversible Disability Status Scale 3 and a late phase, 'Phase 2', from irreversible Disability Status Scale 3 to irreversible Disability Status Scale 6. Outcome was assessed through five parameters: Phase 1 duration, age at Disability Status Scale 3, time to Disability Status Scale 6 from multiple sclerosis onset, Phase 2 duration and age at Disability Status Scale 6. The first three were calculated among all patients, while the last two were computed only among patients who had reached Disability Status Scale 3. The possible influence of early clinical markers on these outcomes was studied using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox models. The analysis was performed in the Rennes multiple sclerosis database (2054 patients, accounting for 26 273 patient-years) as a whole, and according to phenotype at onset (1609 relapsing/445 progressive onset). Our results indicated that the disability progression during Phase 2 was independent of that during Phase 1. Indeed, the median Phase 2 duration was nearly identical (from 6 to 9 years) irrespective of Phase 1 duration (< 3, 3 to < 6, 6 to < 10, 10 to < 15, epsilon 15 years) in the whole population, and in both phenotypes. In relapsing onset multiple sclerosis, gender, age at onset, residual deficit after the first relapse and relapses during the first 2 years of multiple sclerosis were found to be independent predictive factors of disability progression, but only during Phase 1. Our findings demonstrate that multiple sclerosis disability progression follows a two-stage process, with a first stage probably dependant on focal inflammation and a second stage probably independent of current focal inflammation. This concept has obvious implications for the future therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1900 / 1913
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Charcot J.M. Bourneville., 1880, Lecons sur les maladies du systeme nerveux faites a la salpetriere
[2]   Benefit of interferon β-1a on MSFC progression in secondary progressive MS [J].
Cohen, JA ;
Cutter, GR ;
Fischer, JS ;
Goodman, AD ;
Heidenreich, FR ;
Kooijmans, MF ;
Sandrock, AW ;
Rudick, RA ;
Simon, JH ;
Simonian, NA ;
Tsao, EC ;
Whitaker, JN .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) :679-687
[3]   The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis [J].
Coles, AJ ;
Cox, A ;
Le Page, E ;
Jones, J ;
Trip, SA ;
Deans, J ;
Seaman, S ;
Miller, DH ;
Hale, G ;
Waldmann, H ;
Compston, DA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 253 (01) :98-108
[4]  
Coles AJ, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V359, P1786, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0802670
[5]  
Compston A, 2006, BRAIN, V129, P561, DOI 10.1093/brain/awl034
[6]   Multiple sclerosis [J].
Compston, Alastair ;
Coles, Alasdair .
LANCET, 2008, 372 (9648) :1502-1517
[7]   Defining the natural history of multiple sclerosis:: the need for complete data and rigorous definitions.: Answer to Dr Tremlett et al. [J].
Confavreux, C. ;
Ritleng, C. ;
Debouverie, M. ;
Durand-Dubief, F. ;
Marignier, R. ;
Androdias, G. ;
Laforest, L. ;
van Ganse, E. ;
Vukusic, S. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (08) :1144-1147
[8]   Natural history of multiple sclerosis: a unifying concept [J].
Confavreux, C ;
Vukusic, S .
BRAIN, 2006, 129 :606-616
[9]   Age at disability milestones in multiple sclerosis [J].
Confavreux, C ;
Vukusic, S .
BRAIN, 2006, 129 :595-605
[10]   EDMUS, A EUROPEAN DATABASE FOR MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
CONFAVREUX, C ;
COMPSTON, DAS ;
HOMMES, OR ;
MCDONALD, WI ;
THOMPSON, AJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 55 (08) :671-676