The influence of high pressure processing on antimutagenic activities of fruit and vegetable juices

被引:29
作者
Butz, P
Edenharder, R
Fister, H
Tauscher, B
机构
[1] Bundesforsch Anstalt Ernahrung, Inst Chem & Biol, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Med Mikrobiol & Hyg, Abt Hyg, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
关键词
high pressure; fruit; vegetables; antimutagenicity; cooked food mutagen; Salmonella; reversion assay;
D O I
10.1016/S0963-9969(97)00048-3
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In model experiments using the Salmonella/reversion assay (Ames test) and the carcinogen 2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo[4,5-f] quinoline (IQ), antimutagenic activities against IQ had been detected in about 70% of 62 fruit and vegetable species [Edenharder, Kurz, John, Burgard and Seeger (1994) Fd Chem. Toxic. 32, 443-459]. However, thermal stability of the antimutagenic factors varied considerably. As hydrostatic pressure is an alternative to heat in food processing and preservation, homogenates of 14 fruit and vegetable species were exposed to different pressures and temperatures. According to the response of the antimutagenic potential, three groups of produce could be identified: (a) moderate antimutagenic potencies in grapefruit and strawberries were resistant to both heat and pressure; (b) moderate to strong antimutagenic potencies in carrots, cauliflower, kohlrabi, leek, and spinach were more or less sensitive to heat, but not to pressure; (c) antimutagenic activities of beet and tomatoes were affected by extreme pressure only (600 MPa, 50 degrees C; 800 MPa, 35 degrees C). These results should be relevant for the (industrial) processing of horticultural produce as, according to epidemiological studies, diets rich in fruit and vegetables are associated with a low incidence of human cancer. (C) 1997 Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 291
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF HIGH-PRESSURE ON PROTEINS [J].
BALNY, C ;
MASSON, P .
FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 9 (04) :611-628
[2]   FRUIT, VEGETABLES, AND CANCER PREVENTION - A REVIEW OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE [J].
BLOCK, G ;
PATTERSON, B ;
SUBAR, A .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1992, 18 (01) :1-29
[3]  
BOGNAR A, 1993, P INT C BIOAV 93, P352
[4]  
Butz P., 1994, Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft and Technologie, V27, P463, DOI 10.1006/fstl.1994.1093
[5]  
CHEFTEL JC, 1992, COLLOQ INSE, V224, P195
[6]  
DOLL R, 1996, CARCINOGENESIS, V16, P39
[7]   IN-VITRO EFFECT OF VEGETABLE AND FRUIT JUICES ON THE MUTAGENICITY OF 2-AMINO-3-METHYLIMIDAZO[4,5-F]QUINOLINE, 2-AMINO-3,4-DIMETHYLIMIDAZO[4,5-F]QUINOLINE AND 2-AMINO-3,8-DIMETHYLIMIDAZO[4,5-F]QUINOXALINE [J].
EDENHARDER, R ;
KURZ, P ;
JOHN, K ;
BURGARD, S ;
SEEGER, K .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (05) :443-459
[8]   ANTIMUTAGENS AND ANTICARCINOGENS - A SURVEY OF PUTATIVE INTERCEPTOR MOLECULES [J].
HARTMAN, PE ;
SHANKEL, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 1990, 15 (03) :145-182
[9]  
HAYASHI R, 1992, COLLOQ INSE, V224, P185
[10]   DIETARY INHIBITORS OF MUTAGENESIS AND CARCINOGENESIS [J].
HAYATSU, H ;
ARIMOTO, S ;
NEGISHI, T .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1988, 202 (02) :429-446