Survival and recurrence after liver transplantation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma -: A retrospective analysis

被引:202
作者
Otto, G
Heuschen, U
Hofmann, WJ
Krumm, G
Hinz, U
Herfarth, C
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Dept Transplantat Surg, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Pathol, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Gen Surg, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199803000-00015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This study compares the results of liver transplantation (LTx) and liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to test the widespread hypothesis that LTx is the preferable approach for small HCCs. Summary Background Data With respect to scarcity of donor organs and poor results, LTxs for large HCCs are obsolete. Small HCC transplantations have been reported to result in an excellent survival rate. However, the data of comparative studies are controversial. Methods Patients who were treated curatively by LTx (n = 50) or LR (n = 52) for HCC were included in this retrospective study. Survival and freedom from recurrence were analyzed. Patients were stratified according to prognostic factors (pT classification, tumor size, number of tumor nodules, vascular infiltration, and cirrhosis). Results Overall, after LTx and LR the 3-year survival rate and recurrence rate were not significantly different. In the Cox analysis, tumor size (p = 0.02) and vascular infiltration (p = 0.04) were independent variables after LTx, whereas after LR, none of the tested prognostic parameters was significant. With regards to recurrence, tumor size was the only independent factor, after both LTx and LR (p = 0.02, respectively). Directly comparing the two therapeutic approaches, a 3-year survival rate in pT 1/2, oligocentric (1-5 nodules), and oligocentric and small tumors proved to be superior after LTx. The recurrence rate after LTx was superior to LR in pT 1/2 and oligocentric tumors. Remarkably, for small (less than or equal to 5 cm) tumors, LTx and LR resulted in a similar 3-year survival rate and freedom from recurrence. Conclusions According to our analysis, the oncological advantage of LTx compared with LR is questionable. This applies especially for small tumors. Superior results of LTx in early stage HCC and particularly in oligocentric tumors may be attributed to incorrect preoperative diagnosis, Nevertheless, LTx is a reasonable treatment for patients with early stage tumors if a LR is impossible because of tumor localization or poor functional hepatic capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 432
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
BECHSTEIN WO, 1994, TRANSPL INT S1, V7, P238
[2]   INTRAHEPATIC RECURRENCE AFTER RESECTION OF HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA COMPLICATING CIRRHOSIS [J].
BELGHITI, J ;
PANIS, Y ;
FARGES, O ;
BENHAMOU, JP ;
FEKETE, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (02) :114-117
[3]   LIVER RESECTIONS IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS - A WESTERN EXPERIENCE [J].
BISMUTH, H ;
HOUSSIN, D ;
ORNOWSKI, J ;
MERIGGI, F .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 10 (02) :311-317
[4]   LIVER RESECTION VERSUS TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS [J].
BISMUTH, H ;
CHICHE, L ;
ADAM, R ;
CASTAING, D ;
DIAMOND, T ;
DENNISON, A .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (02) :145-151
[5]   LIVER-CELL DYSPLASIA IS A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN CIRRHOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
BORZIO, M ;
BRUNO, S ;
RONCALLI, M ;
MELS, GC ;
RAMELLA, G ;
BORZIO, F ;
LEANDRO, G ;
SERVIDA, E ;
PODDA, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :812-817
[6]   Comparison of resection, liver transplantation and transcatheter oily chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Bronowicki, JP ;
Boudjema, K ;
Chone, L ;
Nisand, G ;
Bazin, C ;
Pflumio, F ;
Uhl, G ;
Wenger, JJ ;
Jaeck, D ;
Boissel, P ;
Bigard, MA ;
Gaucher, P ;
Vetter, D ;
Doffoel, M .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1996, 24 (03) :293-300
[7]  
CHEN MF, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P1025
[8]  
DICARLO V, 1995, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V42, P222
[9]  
FRANCO D, 1990, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V98, P773
[10]  
HSU HC, 1991, HEPATOLOGY, V13, P923, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840130520