Rotating knee prosthesis - Surface or hinge replacement?

被引：8

作者：

Crova, M ^{[1
]}

Cenna, E ^{[1
]}

Olivero, C ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Turin, Ctr Traumatol Ortoped, Clin Ortoped 2, Turin, Italy

来源：

ORTHOPADE | 2000年 / 29卷 / Suppl 1期

关键词：

Knee Prosthesis; Orthopaedic Clinic;

D O I：

10.1007/PL00003682

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Until the early 1990's our experience in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) was based on ACC 2000, Tricon M and MG implants. Starting from 1992 we decided to use a rotating knee prosthesis. At that time in Italy there were many knee replacement devices with rotating elements: Oxford, LCS, Rotaglide and Endomodel from Link. The Endomodel rotating prosthesis was our choice and between 1992 and 1995 we implanted 142 prosthesis of this type, 128 as primary replacement and 14 as TKR revision. The overall results were good or excellent in most of our cases (Fig. 1). During this period we had 6 dislocations of the device (Fig. 2) and 4 infections: 1 from our service and 3 coming from other hospitals.

引用

页码：S43 / S44

页数：2