The CAPTURE registry: Results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting

被引:141
作者
Gray, William A.
Yadav, Jay S.
Verta, Patrick
Scicli, Andrea
Fairman, Ronald
Wholey, Mark
Hopkins, L. Nelson
Atkinson, Richard
Raabe, Rod
Barnwell, Stanley
Green, Richard
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Intervent Vasc Therapies, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Toshiba Stroke Res Ctr, Buffalo, NY USA
[5] Sutter Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[7] Lenox Hill Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
carotid; stent; outcomes; training; post-market study;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.21050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pivotal study data examining carotid stenting with embolic protection as a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy for high surgical risk patients have been acquired under controlled conditions with highly selected physicians and hospitals. This report examines outcomes of carotid stenting post-approval after diffusion of this technology to a broader cross-section of physicians and hospitals. Methods: The Carotid Acculink/Accunet Post-Approval Trial to Uncover Unanticipated or Rare Events (CAPTURE) is a prospective, multi-center registry to assess two important aspects of the post-IDE experience: the safety of carotid stenting by physicians with varying levels of experience as a measure of the adequacy of physician training, and the identification of rare/unexpected device-related complications. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days post-procedure. Results: 3,500 patients were enrolled by 353 physicians at 144 sites. The 30-day primary endpoint event rate was 6.3% (95% CI: 5.5-7.1%) and did not differ among the three operator experience levels (5.3%, 6.0%, and 7.4%; P = 0.31) from most to least experienced, respectively. There were no differences in outcomes among physician specialties when adjusted for case mix. There were no unanticipated device related adverse events. Conclusions: The results of the CAPTURE study compare favorably to those achieved in the predicate pivotal investigations, and suggest that the post-approval transfer of this new therapy to the community practice setting via carotid stent training programs is effective in preparing physicians with varying experience levels and specialty training backgrounds. (C) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 348
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis [J].
Barnett, HJM ;
Taylor, W ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Ferguson, GG ;
Haynes, RB ;
Rankin, RN ;
Clagett, GP ;
Hachinski, VC ;
Sackett, DL ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Meldrum, HE ;
Spence, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1415-1425
[2]   Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: Randomized trial in a community hospital [J].
Brooks, WH ;
McClure, RR ;
Jones, MR ;
Coleman, TC ;
Breathitt, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (06) :1589-1595
[3]   MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY ASSOCIATED WITH CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - EFFECT OF ADJUNCTIVE CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION [J].
COYLE, KA ;
GRAY, BC ;
SMITH, RB ;
SALAM, AA ;
DODSON, TF ;
CHAIKOF, EL ;
LUMSDEN, AB .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 9 (01) :21-27
[4]   RECURRENT CAROTID STENOSIS - A 5-YEAR SERIES OF 65 REOPERATIONS [J].
DAS, MB ;
HERTZER, NR ;
RATLIFF, NB ;
OHARA, PJ ;
BEVEN, EG .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 202 (01) :28-35
[5]   LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS AND EFFECT OF ENDARTERECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC SEVERE CAROTID STENOSIS AND CONTRALATERAL CAROTID STENOSIS OR OCCLUSION - RESULTS FROM NASCET [J].
GASECKI, AP ;
ELIASZIW, M ;
FERGUSON, GG ;
HACHINSKI, V ;
BARNETT, HJM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 83 (05) :778-782
[6]   Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis [J].
Goldstein, LB ;
Samsa, GP ;
Matchar, DB ;
Oddone, EZ .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (04) :750-753
[7]   Carotid stenting and endarterectomy - A clinical and cost comparison of revascularization strategies [J].
Gray, WA ;
White, HJ ;
Barrett, DM ;
Chandran, G ;
Turner, R ;
Reisman, M .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (04) :1063-1070
[8]   Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results [J].
Gray, William A. ;
Hopkins, L. Nelson ;
Yadav, Sanjay ;
Davis, Thomas ;
Wholey, Mark ;
Atkinson, Richard ;
Cremonesi, Alberto ;
Fairman, Ronald ;
Walker, Gary ;
Verta, Patrick ;
Popma, Jeff ;
Virmani, Renu ;
Cohen, David J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (02) :258-268
[9]   Renal insufficiency and altered postoperative risk in carotid endarterectomy [J].
Hamdan, AD ;
Pomposelli, FB ;
Gibbons, GW ;
Campbell, DR ;
LoGerfo, FW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (06) :1006-1010
[10]  
Henry Michel, 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V33, p65A