Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach

被引:13
作者
Arponen, Anni
Kondelin, Hanna
Moilanen, Atte
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Metapopulat Res Grp, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Joensuu, Fac Forestry, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
关键词
persistence; reserve selection; site selection algorithm; species-area relationship; species weight;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00607.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
optimization of resource use is necessary for efficient conservation planning. Many reserve-selection algorithms aim to identify representative but inexpensive networks, which may lead to selecting small sites due to their lower costs and collectively higher species richness. Nevertheless, larger sites would be preferable regarding species' long-term persistence. An area-based refinement can be used to overcome this problem. We used a reserve-planning framework in which continuous benefit functions valued representation (numbers of populations), and differential species weights were based on a species' local rarity and threatened status. We introduced a refinement based on the species-area relationship that provides relatively higher values for larger sites. We applied the proposed method to rich fen vegetation in southern Finland. The species-area refinement resulted in a network of significantly larger sites with minor trade-offs with representation (numbers of populations). Giving endangered species higher weights ensured that the trade-off occurred mostly between site size and representation of low-priority species. We recommend using a species-area refinement for practical, maximum-coverage conservation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: Representation, species weighting, and benefit functions [J].
Arponen, A ;
Heikkinen, RK ;
Thomas, CD ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :2009-2014
[2]  
Brook B. W., 2002, CONSERVATION ECOLOGY
[3]   Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (05) :1402-1413
[4]   Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Araújo, MB ;
Wilson, RJ ;
Thomas, CD ;
Cowley, MJR ;
Moilanen, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2004, 41 (02) :252-262
[5]  
DUNHAM J, 1999, CONSERVATION ECOLOGY
[6]   How much habitat is enough? [J].
Fahrig, L .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 100 (01) :65-74
[7]  
HAMETAHTI L, 1998, FIELD FLORA FINLAND
[8]   A PRACTICAL MODEL OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS [J].
HANSKI, I .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (01) :151-162
[9]  
Hanski I., 2005, SHRINKING WORLD ECOL
[10]  
Heikkila R., 1992, PEATLAND ECOSYSTEMS, P244