Urinary tract infection and patient satisfaction after flexible cystoscopy and urodynamic evaluation

Objectives. To investigate the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria and to assess patient satisfaction after flexible cystoscopy (FC) and urodynamic (UD) evaluation in a prospective survey. The incidence of urinary tract infection after FC and UD studies and the use of prophylactic antibiotics are issues of debate. The tolerability and acceptance of FC and UD studies by patients have not been thoroughly documented. It would be helpful to be able to give such information to patients before performing these procedures. Methods, A total of 215 nonconsecutive patients seen as outpatients for FC and UD studies to evaluate various indications were studied. A midstream urine sample was taken before and 48 hours after the procedures, Patients were given a questionnaire that inquired about the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms before and 48 hours after the procedures. The self-administered questionnaire included questions to assess patients' tolerance of the procedures and how it compared with their expectations. Results. Of the 201 patients analyzed (FC 103, UD studies 98), 9 patients (4.5%) developed significant bacteriuria within 48 hours of FC and UD studies. Only 2 patients with significant bacteriuria reported newly developed symptoms within 48 hours. In a subgroup of 25 patients who were given prophylactic antibiotics for various reasons, 6 (24%) reported new symptoms, although none developed significant bacteriuria. The association between patients who had preprocedure pyuria (n = 7) and the development of significant growth after the procedure (n = 6) was significant (P < 0.01). In response to the patient-satisfaction questionnaire, 166 (82.5%) reported that the procedure was not as bad as they expected, and 200 (99.5%) said that they would undergo the test again if necessary. Conclusions. FC and UD studies are safe, well-tolerated procedures. The addition of prophylactic antibiotics in these procedures is unnecessary, unless specific indications are present. UROLOGY 56: 37-39, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.