A positive CaverMap response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy

被引:46
作者
Kim, HL [1 ]
Stoffel, DS [1 ]
Mhoon, DA [1 ]
Brendler, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Urol Sect, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00748-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine whether preservation of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs), defined by a positive CaverMap response, correlates with the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy. Methods. We studied a group of 60 men who were potent preoperatively who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by one surgeon. The CaverMap was used after removal of the prostate to assess the integrity of the NVBs. Postoperative potency was assessed by a postal questionnaire and telephone interview, administered independently of the treating surgeon. Men were considered potent if they reported postoperative erections consistently sufficient for vaginal penetration with or without the use of sildenafil. Results. The mean patient age was 59 years, and the median follow-up was 365 days. A positive CaverMap response was obtained in 73 (77%) of the 95 NVBs tested. The overall potency rate was 18%. No patients with a bilateral negative CaverMap response were potent, and 2 (22%) of 9 with a unilateral CaverMap response (negative versus unilateral response, P = 0.46) and 6 (27%) of 22 with bilateral CaverMap responses (negative versus bilateral response, P = 0.32) were potent. Conclusions. A positive CaverMap response, suggesting that a successful nerve-sparing prostatectomy had been performed, was obtained in 77% of the NVBs tested. Nevertheless, with a median follow-up of 12 months, most patients with a positive CaverMap response remained impotent. This suggests that other factors are critical to the recovery of sexual function after radical prostatectomy. UROLOGY 56: 561-564, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 564
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins [J].
Alsikafi, NF ;
Brendler, CB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (04) :1281-1285
[2]   Penile fibrotic changes after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Ciancio, SJ ;
Kim, ED .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (01) :101-106
[3]   INVESTIGATION OF IMPOTENCE BY INTERNAL PUDENDAL ANGIOGRAPHY - EXPERIENCE WITH 73 CASES [J].
GRAY, RR ;
KERESTECI, AG ;
STLOUIS, EL ;
GROSMAN, H ;
JEWETT, MAS ;
RANKIN, JT ;
PROVAN, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (04) :773-780
[4]   Apoptosis in the rat penis after penile denervation [J].
Klein, LT ;
Miller, MI ;
Buttyan, R ;
Raffo, AJ ;
Burchard, M ;
Devris, G ;
Cao, YC ;
Olsson, C ;
Shabsigh, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) :626-630
[5]  
Klot Laurence, 1999, Journal of Urology, V161, P335
[6]  
Klotz L, 1998, UROLOGY, V52, P537, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00319-7
[7]   The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index - Development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Hays, RD ;
Fink, A ;
Ganz, PA ;
Leake, B ;
Brook, RH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (07) :1002-1012
[8]   ELECTROSTIMULATION AND PENILE ERECTION [J].
LUE, TF ;
SCHMIDT, RA ;
TANAGHO, EA .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1985, 40 (01) :60-64
[9]   Topographical anatomy of the penile arteries [J].
MartinezPineiro, L ;
Julve, E ;
MartinezPineiro, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03) :463-467
[10]   Is intraoperative electrostimulation of erectile nerves possible? [J].
Michl, U ;
Dietz, R ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1610-1613