A prospective evaluation of an algorithm incorporating routine preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in suspected pancreatic cancer

被引:121
作者
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
Varadarajulu, Shyam
Desai, Shilpa
Shirley, Rhett
Heslin, Martin J.
Mehra, Mohit
Arnoletti, Juan P.
Eltoum, Isam
Wilcox, Charles M.
Vickers, Selwyn M.
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Endoscop Ultrasound Program, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Surg Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
pancreatic cancer; fine needle aspiration; cytology; endoscopic ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-007-0151-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Whether tissue diagnosis is required in the preoperative evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer remains controversial. We prospectively evaluated the accuracy, safety, and potential impact on surgical intervention of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the preoperative evaluation of suspected pancreatic cancer. Methods All patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our institution (n = 547) over a 4.5-year period were enrolled. Patients underwent surgical exploration and resection based on their comorbidity status, evidence of resectability based on spiral computed tomography (CT) and EUS imaging reviewed in a multidisciplinary approach. Results Of 547 patients enrolled (median age 64 years, 60% male), 49% presented with obstructive jaundice. The operating characteristics of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses were: sensitivity 95% (95% CI: 93.2-95.4), specificity 92% (95% CI: 86.6-95.7), positive predictive value 98% (95% CI: 97-99), negative predictive value 80% (95% CI: 74.9-82.7). The overall accuracy of EUS-FNA was 94.1% (95% CI: 92.0-94). Of the 414 true positive patients by EUS-FNA, 138 (33%) were explored. Of patients deemed operable by combined imaging, 42% had surgical resection. Eighty-two percent of true positive patients were ultimately found inoperable and received palliative therapy or chemotherapy. Of the 94 patients with true negative cytology based on extended follow-up, only 7 (7%) underwent surgical resection. Of those with false negative diagnoses (n = 24), 5 patients underwent exploration/resection based on detection of mass lesions by EUS. The remaining patients had unresectable disease. Mild self-limiting pancreatitis occurred in (0.91%). Conclusions EUS-FNA is a safe and highly accurate method for tissue diagnosis in suspected pancreatic cancer. This approach allows for preoperative counseling of patients, minimizing surgeon's operative time in cases of unresectable disease, and avoids surgical biopsies in the majority of patients with inoperable disease. In addition, it allows for conservative management of patients with benign biopsies. We still, however, recommend exploration of patients with clinical scenario suspicious for pancreatic cancer, a mass found on EUS or CT, but inconclusive or negative cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 819
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]
A cost-minimization analysis of alternative strategies in diagnosing pancreatic cancer [J].
Chen, VK ;
Arguedas, MR ;
Kilgore, ML ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (11) :2223-2234
[3]
Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Tamhane, A ;
Varadarajulu, S ;
Wilcox, CM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :622-629
[4]
EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Tamhane, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (06) :700-708
[5]
Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Gress, FG ;
Savides, TJ ;
Wiersema, MJ ;
Kochman, ML ;
Ahmad, NA ;
Ginsberg, GG ;
Erickson, RA ;
DeWitt, J ;
Van Dam, J ;
Nickl, NJ ;
Levy, MJ ;
Clain, JE ;
Chak, A ;
Sivak, MV ;
Wong, R ;
Isenberg, G ;
Scheiman, JM ;
Bounds, B ;
Kimmey, MB ;
Saunders, MD ;
Chang, KJ ;
Sharma, A ;
Nguyen, P ;
Lee, JG ;
Edmundowicz, SA ;
Early, D ;
Azar, R ;
Etemad, B ;
Chen, YK ;
Waxman, I ;
Shami, V ;
Catalano, MF ;
Wilcox, CM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (03) :385-389
[6]
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Chen, VK ;
Eltoum, IA ;
Jhala, D ;
Chhieng, DC ;
Jhala, N ;
Vickers, SM ;
Wilcox, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) :2663-2668
[7]
Prognostic factors for survival in pancreatic cancer: a population-based study [J].
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A. ;
Desmond, Renee A. ;
Wilcox, C. Mel ;
Wilson, Reda J. ;
Manchikalapati, Pavan ;
Fouad, Mona M. ;
Eltoum, Isam ;
Vickers, Selwyn M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 192 (03) :322-329
[8]
Cytologic grade independently predicts survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Eltoum, IA ;
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Chhieng, DC ;
Tamhane, A ;
Crowe, R ;
Jhala, D ;
St John, KD ;
Wilcox, CM ;
Siegal, GP ;
Vickers, S ;
Jhala, NC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 124 (05) :697-707
[9]
Endoscopic ultrasonography - Guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer [J].
Gress, F ;
Gottlieb, K ;
Sherman, S ;
Lehman, G .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (06) :459-464
[10]
Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Wiersema, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) :1386-1391