Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration

被引:144
作者
Bjerregaard, Toke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Aarhus Sch Business, Ctr Org Renewal & Evolut, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
New institutionalism; Institutional logics; University-industry collaboration; R&D collaboration; TRIPLE-HELIX; UNIVERSITY; INNOVATION; BOUNDARIES; ORGANIZATIONS; ISOMORPHISM; SCIENTISTS; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; AGENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Research on university-industry (UI) collaboration has addressed how cultural differences between firms and universities tend to impede knowledge exchange and impose challenges on project control if not properly addressed. Relatively little research has examined in-depth how changing institutional logics of R&D practice shape concrete UI collaborations at the micro-level of interacting researchers. The purpose of this study is to examine how conflicting and converging institutional logics of R&D work enable and constrain the process of R&D collaboration between small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and public university departments. This qualitative study covers the total population of public university departments and firms involved in collaborative research projects sponsored by a programme under the National Strategic Research Council (NSRC) in Denmark. The findings show that many of the collaborating researchers experienced an institutional convergence constituting a shared cultural space for knowledge exchange and communication in their joint projects. In some cases this lack of normative conflict was due to a blurring of institutional logics governing R&D in the two sectors. Furthermore, some researchers were able to use their social skills to bridge perceived institutional gaps. Implications for future research and UI collaboration are addressed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 108
页数:9
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] University-industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    Di Costa, Flavia
    Solazzi, Marco
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (6-7) : 498 - 507
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, Comparative Social Research
  • [4] How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship
    Battilana, Julie
    Leca, Bernard
    Boxenbaum, Eva
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2009, 3 : 65 - 107
  • [5] Institutionalizing the triple helix:: research funding and norms in the academic system
    Benner, M
    Sandström, U
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) : 291 - 301
  • [6] Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level
    Bercovitz, Janet
    Feldman, Maryann
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (01) : 69 - 89
  • [7] MAKING UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH SUCCEED
    BLOEDON, RV
    STOKES, DR
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1994, 37 (02) : 44 - 48
  • [8] Withholding research results in academic life science - Evidence from a national survey of faculty
    Blumenthal, D
    Campbell, EG
    Anderson, MS
    Causino, N
    Louis, KS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (15): : 1224 - 1228
  • [9] University researchers working with private companies
    Boardman, P. Craig
    Ponomariov, Branco L.
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (02) : 142 - 153
  • [10] SPECIFICITY OF SCIENTIFIC FIELD AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS OF PROGRESS OF REASON
    BOURDIEU, P
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 1975, 14 (06): : 19 - 47