Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient

被引:74
作者
Baron, Paul [1 ]
Dorrius, Monique D. [1 ]
Kappert, Peter [1 ]
Oudkerk, Matthijs [1 ]
Sijens, Paul E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
fibroglandular breast tissue; Magnetic Resonance imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging; perfusion; fat suppression; HIGH B-VALUES; IN-VIVO; WATER DIFFUSION; SIGNAL DECAY; MRI; CANCER; ADC; COMPARTMENTATION; DIFFERENTIATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1002/nbm.1475
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of normal fibroglandular breast tissue was investigated. Seven volunteers (14 breasts) were scanned using diffusion weighting factors (b values) up to 1600 s/mm(2) and the four different fat suppression techniques: STIR, fat saturation, SPAIR, and Water Excitation. The relationship between the logarithmic DW attenuation curves and b was linear for b values up to 600 s/mm(2) (R-2>0.999). Small differences were noted between the ADC values obtained with the various fat suppression methods, especially at the higher b values. Water Excitation had the highest mean SNR, exceeding STIR (p=0.03) though not significantly different from fat saturation and SPAIR. In conclusion, the ADC of fibroglandular breast tissue is not influenced by microperfusion and Water Excitation is recommended because it yielded the best SNR values. These factors may be crucial in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Chen, MH ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Lehman, C ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Smazal, SF ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Schnall, MD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2735-2742
[2]  
Brugières P, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P692
[3]  
Clark CA, 2000, MAGN RESON MED, V44, P852, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<852::AID-MRM5>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-A
[5]   Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: Perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) :236-241
[6]   Breast cancer: Regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging - Initial results [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (02) :558-565
[7]  
Dietrich O, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V45, P448, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45:3<448::AID-MRM1059>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]  
Englander SA, 1997, NMR BIOMED, V10, P348, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199710)10:7<348::AID-NBM487>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-R