The low-light reduction in the quantum yield of photosynthesis: potential errors and biases when calculating the maximum quantum yield

被引:71
作者
Johnson, Z
Barber, RT
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会; 美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
Emerson enhancement; models; P-E; P-I; photosynthetic quantum yield; quantum efficiency;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022440305765
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 [植物学];
摘要
Photosynthesis-irradiance (P-E) curves are widely used to describe photosynthetic efficiency and potential. Contemporary models assume maximal photosynthetic quantum yield (phi) at low irradiances. But P-E observations made with both oxygen evolution and carbon uptake techniques show that this is not always the case. Using new and published data in conjunction with modeling exercises, we demonstrate that regardless of the mechanism there can be reductions in phi at low irradiances that are not readily observable using conventional P-E analyses. We also show that analytical errors, such as inaccurate estimation of dark oxygen consumption or carbon uptake, can markedly affect the structure of phi-E curves with negligible effect on P-E curve structure. Whether from respiration 'corrections' or other mechanisms, these deviations in phi at low light levels from the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis (phi(max)) can lead to significant errors (>50%) in the estimation of the linear portion of the P-E curve and ultimately phi(max). Non-linear models of P-E, such as the rectangular hyperbola, quadratic, exponential and hyperbolic tangent that are commonly used to estimate the initial slope (alpha) of the P-E curve assume that phi is maximal at low light levels and therefore can err in the estimation of phi(max) when phi is reduced at low light levels. Using a diverse data set of 622 P-E curves with a total of 7623 points, we show that although model skills are high (r(2) = 0.96 +/- 0.05, 0.97 +/- 0.04, 0.97 +/- 0.04 and 0.97 +/- 0.04, respectively), a large fraction of the model-predicted phi(max) differ by greater than 10% from true phi(max) values (91%, 50%, 82% and 46%, respectively). Data from these observations and modeling exercises lead us to suggest that phi(max) be determined by directly estimating the true maximum of a phi-E curve rather than using the more conventional methodology employing the initial slope of the P-E curve.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Baker NR., 1996, Photosynthesis and the Environment, DOI [10.1007/0-306-48135-9_14, DOI 10.1007/0]
[2]
Optima and limiting factors. With two diagrams in the text [J].
Blackman, F. F. .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1905, 19 (73-76) :281-296
[3]
CULLEN JJ, 1992, ENVIR SCI R, V43, P69
[4]
FEEDBACK CONTROLLING OXYGEN PRODUCTION IN A CROSS-REACTION BETWEEN 2 PHOTOSYSTEMS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
DINER, B ;
MAUZERALL, D .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1973, 305 (02) :329-352
[5]
Falkowski P. G., 2013, Aquatic photosynthesis
[6]
COOPERATION OF CHARGES IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC O2 EVOLUTION .2. DAMPING OF FLASH YIELD OSCILLATION, DEACTIVATION [J].
FORBUSH, B ;
KOK, B ;
MCGLOIN, MP .
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 1971, 14 (03) :307-&
[7]
LACK OF AGREEMENT AMONG MODELS FOR ESTIMATING THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC PARAMETERS [J].
FRENETTE, JJ ;
DEMERS, S ;
LEGENDRE, L ;
DODSON, J .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1993, 38 (03) :679-687
[8]
Geider RJ, 1992, ALGAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS, V2
[9]
KOK EFFECT IN CHLAMYDOMONAS-REINHARDI [J].
HEALEY, FP ;
MYERS, J .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 47 (03) :373-&
[10]
MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC LIGHT-RESPONSE CURVES IN ALGAE IN THE CONTEXT OF PHOTOINHIBITION AND DIEL CHANGES [J].
HENLEY, WJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (06) :729-739