Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study

被引:78
作者
Parikh-Patel, A
Allen, M
Wright, WE
机构
[1] Inst Publ Hlth, Calif Canc Registry, Canc Epidemiol Res Unit, Sacramento, CA 95812 USA
[2] Inst Publ Hlth, Canc Surveillance Res Unit, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Canc Surveillance Sect, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
关键词
cohort studies; neoplasms; questionnaires; recall; registries;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwg006
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Self-reported cancer data from the California Teachers Study were validated by using California Cancer Registry data. The California Teachers Study cohort consists of 133,479 active and retired California teachers. In 1995-1996, data from a mailed questionnaire were linked to the California Cancer Registry data. Sensitivity and specificity of 11 types of cancer were calculated. Multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate correlates of false-positive and false-negative reporting. Sensitivities showed great variation by cancer site. The highest sensitivities were observed for breast (96.4%) and thyroid (92.9%) cancers, whereas the lowest sensitivities were those for cervical (44.3%), endometrial (69.1%), and other skin (53.6%) cancers. The sensitivities for in situ cancers (at the time of diagnosis) were considerably lower than those for invasive cancers in about half of the cancer types surveyed. The specificities for individual cancer sites ranged from 90% to 99%; the highest were those for lung cancer, leukemia, and Hodgkin's disease (all 99.9%). The lowest specificity was for other skin cancer (90.2%). In situ stage at diagnosis and older age were significantly associated with false-positive reporting. Age and non-White race were associated with false-negative reporting. These findings suggest that the feasibility of using self-reported data without verification in epidemiologic studies of cancer varies by site.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 545
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Bergmann MM, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P556
  • [2] High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States)
    Bernstein, L
    Allen, M
    Anton-Culver, H
    Deapen, D
    Horn-Ross, PL
    Peel, D
    Pinder, R
    Reynolds, P
    Sullivan-Halley, J
    West, D
    Wright, W
    Ziogas, A
    Ross, RK
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (07) : 625 - 635
  • [3] Prevalence of cancer in the elderly: Discrepancies between self reported and registry data
    Berthier, F
    Grosclaude, P
    Bocquet, H
    Faliu, B
    Cayla, F
    MachelardRoumagnac, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (03) : 445 - 447
  • [4] *CAL DEP HLTH SERV, 1998, CAL CANC REP SYST ST, V4
  • [5] *CAL DEP HLTH SERV, 1997, CAL CANC REP SYST ST, V3
  • [6] *CAL DEP HLTH SERV, 1997, CAL CANC REP SYST ST, V2
  • [7] INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS
    CASSILETH, BR
    ZUPKIS, RV
    SUTTONSMITH, K
    MARCH, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) : 832 - 836
  • [8] UNDER-REPORTING OF CANCER IN MEDICAL SURVEYS - SOURCE OF SYSTEMATIC-ERROR IN CANCER RESEARCH
    CHAMBERS, LW
    SPITZER, WO
    HILL, GB
    HELLIWELL, BE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1976, 104 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [9] CHEN VW, 2000, CANC N AM 1993 1997, V1
  • [10] VALIDATION OF QUESTIONNAIRE INFORMATION ON RISK-FACTORS AND DISEASE OUTCOMES IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF WOMEN
    COLDITZ, GA
    MARTIN, P
    STAMPFER, MJ
    WILLETT, WC
    SAMPSON, L
    ROSNER, B
    HENNEKENS, CH
    SPEIZER, FE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (05) : 894 - 900