Audit of effectiveness of routine follow-up clinics after radiotherapy for cancer -: A report of the REACT working group of ESTRO

被引:16
作者
Ataman, ÖU
Barrett, A
Davidson, S
De Haas-Kock, D
Dische, S
Dubray, B
Grillo, IM
Kramar, A
Haie-Meder, C
Heeren, G
Hideghety, K
LeVay, J
Maher, J
Marcenaro, M
Muller, RP
Reguerio, CA
Saunders, MI
Turesson, I
Van Houtte, P
Vitale, V
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Med Hlth Policy & Practice, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Hosp, NHS Trust, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
[4] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[5] Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Northwood HA6 2RN, Middx, England
[6] Ctr Reg Lutte Contre Canc Henri Becquerel, F-76038 Rouen, France
[7] Univ Hosp Santa Maria, P-1649035 Lisbon, Portugal
[8] Maastricht Radiat Oncol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[9] Val Aurelle Paul Lamarque, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[10] Inst Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[11] ESTRO Off, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[12] Univ Kaposvar, Inst Diagnost & Radiat Oncol, H-7400 Kaposvar, Hungary
[13] Ipswich Hosp, NHS Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, Suffolk, England
[14] Natl Canc Ctr, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[15] Klin & Poliklin Strahlentherapie, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[16] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, San Martin Porres 28035, Spain
[17] Uppsala Univ, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
[18] Inst Jules Bordet 1, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
follow-up clinics; audit; radiotherapy; cancer outcomes; surveillance;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2004.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology was funded by the EU for a project on recording providing education, and ameliorating the consequences of treatment (REACT). An European audit was carried out as part of which to assess the usefulness of current follow-up practices. Patients and methods: Over a 4-month period in 15 cancer centres in 10 countries, patients attending for routine follow-up completed a questionnaire covering their expectations of and satisfaction with the visit. This was matched with a questionnaire completed by the physician about the content and usefulness of the consultation. The feasibility of a short toxicity scale developed by Dische and Saunders was also investigated. Results: In total, 2303 matched questionnaires were analysed. Forty percent of the patients had symptoms or medical problems related to their disease. In 18% there was a positive finding on clinical examination. In 28% investigations were undertaken part of departmental routine practice. Ten percent of the investigations showed an abnormal result. Ninety nine percent of physicians and 85% of the patients expressed satisfaction. Using the short toxicity scale rates of recording toxicity could be increased from 28 to 93%. Conclusions: There is wide variation in follow-up practices among European centres. There was a low incidence of positive findings clinically or with routine investigations. A simple scale for recording morbidity has proved easy to use by departments, which have not routinely used one of the standard measures. Further work will attempt to produce an European guideline for effective routine follow-up after radiotherapy. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 249
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001768.PUB2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002200
[3]   National audit of the management and outcome of carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiotherapy in 1993 [J].
Denton, AS ;
Bond, SJ ;
Matthews, S ;
Bentzen, SM ;
Maher, EJ .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 12 (06) :347-353
[4]   Complexity and simplicity in the measurement and recording of the adverse effects of cancer treatment [J].
Dische, S ;
Saunders, MI .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (03) :249-251
[5]   The utility of follow-up testing after curative cancer therapy - A critical review and economic analysis [J].
Edelman, MJ ;
Meyers, FJ ;
Siegel, D .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 12 (05) :318-331
[6]  
*ESTRO, 2000, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V57, pS1
[8]  
Marcus AC, 1998, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V7, P470, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199811/12)7:6<470::AID-PON325>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-Z
[10]  
*SPSS WIND, 1989, SPSS WIND REL 11 0 1