Microscopic venous invasion: A prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma

被引:28
作者
Lang, H
Lindner, V
Saussine, C
Havel, D
Faure, F
Jacqmin, D
机构
[1] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Serv Chirurg Urol, Dept Urol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Dept Pathol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
关键词
renal cell carcinoma; prognosis; microscopic venous invasion; radical nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1159/000020338
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Microscopic venous invasion (MVI) is characterized by local destruction of the endothelium by a tumor. The prognostic value of MVI in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not well established. Materials and Methods: From 1980 until 1990, 255 patients (169 men and 86 women), aged 16-87 (mean 60) years were treated by radical nephrectomy for N0M0 RCC. There were 9 pT1, 163 pT2, 30 pT3a, 34 pT3b, and 19 pT3ab (TNM 1992). The median follow-up time was 74 months. MVI was determined by a double-blind histological study with immunohistochemical staining. Results: MVI was noted in 74 patients (29%). MVI significantly increased metastatic progression (p = 0.003). Only stage and Fuhrman's grade were significant factors for metastatic progression in a multivariate analysis. MVI decreased the actuarial survival rates at 1 year (p = 0.01), but not significantly at 5 and 10 years. MVI and non-MVI survival curves were statistically different with the Peto/Wilcoxon (p = 0.04) and Gehan/Wilcoxon (p = 0.03) tests, but not with the log rank test (p = 0.06). MVI decreased survival in cases with a tumor size of 10 cm or more, capsular invasion, macroscopic venous invasion, stage pT3ab, sarcomatoid cell carcinoma and Fuhrman's grade IV. Only the stage was a significant factor for survival in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: in RCC, MVI is related to cancer progression and survival, but probably not as an independent prognostic factor. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG. Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 605
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   VALIDATION OF THE TUMOR, NODES AND METASTASIS CLASSIFICATION OF RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
BASSIL, B ;
DOSORETZ, DE ;
PROUT, GR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 134 (03) :450-454
[2]   CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR STAGE-IV RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
BENNETT, RT ;
LERNER, SE ;
TAUB, HC ;
DUTCHER, JP ;
FLEISCHMANN, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :32-34
[3]   ANALYSIS OF IMAGING MODALITIES, STAGING SYSTEMS, AND PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS FOR RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
DINNEY, CPN ;
AWAD, SA ;
GAJEWSKI, JB ;
BELITSKY, P ;
LANNON, SG ;
MACK, FG ;
MILLARD, OH .
UROLOGY, 1992, 39 (02) :122-129
[4]   RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
GOLIMBU, M ;
JOSHI, P ;
SPERBER, A ;
TESSLER, A ;
ALASKARI, S ;
MORALES, P .
UROLOGY, 1986, 27 (04) :291-301
[5]  
HANKE PR, 1996, 12 C EUR ASS UR PAR
[6]   EVALUATION OF THE NEW TUMOR, NODES AND METASTASES CLASSIFICATION OF RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
HERMANEK, P ;
SCHROTT, KM ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
MARSHALL, FF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (02) :238-242
[7]  
LAS TM, 1995, CANCER, V76, P824
[8]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL-CANCER TREATED WITH BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERS [J].
MANI, S ;
TODD, MB ;
KATZ, K ;
POO, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :35-40
[9]   Renal-cell carcinoma [J].
Motzer, RJ ;
Bander, NH ;
Nanus, DM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (12) :865-875
[10]   MICROSCOPIC VENOUS INFILTRATION AS PREDICTOR OF RELAPSE IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
MRSTIK, C ;
SALAMON, J ;
WEBER, R ;
STOGERMAYER, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (02) :271-274