Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome

被引:510
作者
Meier-Kriesche, HU
Port, FK
Ojo, AO
Rudich, SM
Hanson, JA
Cibrik, DM
Leichtman, AB
Kaplan, B
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
graft survival; mortality and transplantation; post-transplant death; end-stage renal disease; dialysis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00287.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Numerous factors are known to impact on patient survival after renal transplantation. Recent studies have confirmed a survival advantage for renal transplant patients over those waiting on dialysis. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that longer waiting times are more deleterious than shorter waiting times, that is, to detect a "dose effect" for waiting time. Methods. We analyzed 73,103 primary adult renal transplants registered at the United States Renal Data System Registry from 1988 to 1997 for the primary endpoints of death with functioning graft and death-censored graft failure by Cox proportional hazard models. All models were corrected for donor and recipient demographics and other factors known to affect outcome after kidney transplantation. Results. A longer waiting time on dialysis is a significant risk factor for death-censored graft survival and patient death with functioning graft after renal transplantation (P < 0.001 each). Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, and over 48 months confer a 21, 28, 41, 53, and 72% increase in mortality risk after transplantation, respectively. Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and over 24 months confer a 17, 37, 55, and 68% increase in risk for death-censored graft loss after transplantation, respectively. Conclusions. Longer waiting times on dialysis negatively impact on post-transplant graft and patient survival. These data strongly support the hypothesis that patients who reach endstage renal disease should receive a renal transplant as early as possible in order to enhance their chances of long-term survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1317
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], USRDS 1999 ANN DAT R
  • [2] Patient survival after renal transplantation; more than 25 years follow-up
    Arend, SM
    Mallat, MJK
    Westendorp, RJW
    vanderwoude, FJ
    vanEs, LA
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (08) : 1672 - 1679
  • [3] Pre-emptive kidney transplantation: the attractive alternative
    Asderakis, A
    Augustine, T
    Dyer, P
    Short, C
    Campbell, B
    Parrott, NR
    Johnson, RWG
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 13 (07) : 1799 - 1803
  • [4] CHATENOUD L, 1994, KIDNEY INT S44, V45, P92
  • [5] Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant
    Cosio, FG
    Alamir, A
    Yim, S
    Pesavento, TE
    Falkenhain, ME
    Henry, ML
    Elkhammas, EA
    Davies, EA
    Bumgardner, GL
    Ferguson, RM
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 53 (03) : 767 - 772
  • [6] The serum concentration of the advanced glycation end-product N-epsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine is increased in uremia
    Degenhardt, TP
    Grass, L
    Reddy, S
    Thorpe, SR
    Diamandis, EP
    Baynes, JW
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 (04) : 1064 - 1067
  • [7] DESCAMPSLATSCHA B, 1994, SEMIN NEPHROL, V14, P253
  • [8] DRUKKER A, 1990, CHILD NEPHROL UROL, V10, P61
  • [9] Effect of HLA matching on the relative risk of mortality for kidney recipients - A comparison of the mortality risk after transplant to the mortality risk of remaining on the waiting list
    Edwards, EB
    Bennett, LE
    Cecka, JM
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (09) : 1274 - 1277
  • [10] THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE
    EVANS, RW
    MANNINEN, DL
    GARRISON, LP
    HART, LG
    BLAGG, CR
    GUTMAN, RA
    HULL, AR
    LOWRIE, EG
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (09) : 553 - 559