Comparing the predictive validity of five cigarette dependence questionnaires

被引:51
作者
Courvoisier, Delphine S. [1 ]
Etter, Jean-Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
Tobacco use disorder; Predictive validity; CDS; FTND; NDSS; Confidence to quit; NICOTINE DEPENDENCE; FAGERSTROM TEST; SMOKING-CESSATION; TOLERANCE QUESTIONNAIRE; ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE; SYNDROME SCALE; SMOKERS; HEAVINESS; INDEX; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.011
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To determine whether the long and short versions of the Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS), the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) and the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS) predicted smoking abstinence. Method: We collected data via Internet in 2004-2007 in 2343 current smokers. Follow-up surveys were conducted after 8 days (N=456) and 31 days (N=486). We assessed the ability of dependence ratings to predict smoking abstinence, controlling for confidence and intention to quit smoking. Results: All dependence scales were significant predictors of smoking abstinence at the 8-day follow-up, with the CDS being the best predictor (OR: 3.98 per SD unit, 15% of variance explained). Results were similar but stronger among respondents intending to quit (OR: 6.68, 26% of variance explained). At the 31-day follow-up, only the FTND, HSI and NDSS Continuity subscale were still significant, albeit weak, predictors of abstinence (OR: 1.56, 2% of variance explained). Conclusion: Among the scales under scrutiny, the CDS had the best predictive validity after 8 days. None of the scales explained more than 2% of the variance in abstinence after 31 days. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The Heaviness of Smoking Index as a predictor of smoking cessation in Canada [J].
Chaiton, Michael O. ;
Cohen, Joanna E. ;
McDonald, Paul W. ;
Bondy, Susan J. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2007, 32 (05) :1031-1042
[2]  
Chatkin JM, 2006, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V10, P499
[3]   A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys [J].
Cook, C ;
Heath, F ;
Thompson, RL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (06) :821-836
[4]   Using item response theory to study the convergent and discriminant validity of three questionnaires measuring cigarette dependence [J].
Courvoisier, Delphine ;
Etter, Jean-Francois .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2008, 22 (03) :391-401
[5]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[6]  
EDWARDS G, 1986, BRIT J ADDICT, V81, P171
[7]   ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE - PROVISIONAL DESCRIPTION OF A CLINICAL SYNDROME [J].
EDWARDS, G ;
GROSS, MM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 1 (6017) :1058-1061
[9]   A comparison of the content-, construct- and predictive validity of the cigarette dependence scale and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence [J].
Etter, JF .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2005, 77 (03) :259-268
[10]   A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: The Cigarette Dependence Scale [J].
Etter, JF ;
Le Houezec, J ;
Perneger, TV .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 28 (02) :359-370