The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL

被引：48

作者：

Beers, Pieter J.

Boshuizen, Henny P. A.

Kirschner, Paul A.

Gijselaers, Wim H.

机构：

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands

[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands

[3] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands

[4] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands

来源：

LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION | 2007年 / 17卷 / 04期

关键词：

content analysis; reliability; validity; negotiation; common ground;

D O I：

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.002

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

CSCL research has given rise to a plethora of analysis methods, all with specific analysis goals, units of analysis, and for specific types of data (chat, threaded discussions, etc.). This article describes some challenges of CSCL-analysis. The development of an analysis method for negotiation processes in multidisciplinary teams serves as an example of how these challenges occur in practice. Results reveal a number of tensions with regard to establishing reliable coding procedures without compromising validity, such as how to define codes. and rules for applying codes. The discussion offers some guidelines for content analysis of CSCL-data. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：427 / 435

页数：9

共 28 条

[1]

Alpay L., 1998, LEARNING MULTIPLE RE, P152

[2]

[Anonymous], NAT CONV ASS ED COMM

[3]

Baker M., 1999, COLLABORATIVE LEARNI, V31, P63

[4] Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments [J].