The contribution of birth defects to preterm birth and low birth weight

被引:45
作者
Dolan, Siobhan M.
Gross, Susan J.
Merkatz, Irwin R.
Faber, Vincent
Sullivan, Lisa M.
Malone, Fergal D.
Porter, T. Flint
Nyberg, David A.
Comstock, Christine H.
Hankins, Gary D. V.
Eddleman, Keith
Dugoff, Lorraine
Craigo, Sabrina D.
Timor-Tritsch, Ilan
Carr, Stephen R.
Wolfe, Honor M.
Bianchi, Diana W.
D'Alton, Mary E.
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] DM STAT Inc, Malden, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
[5] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Intermt Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[8] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[9] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
[10] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[11] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[12] Tufts Univ, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[13] NYU, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[14] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[15] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[16] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000275264.78506.63
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of birth defects on preterm birth and low birth weight. Methods: Data from a large, prospective multi-center trial, the First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Trial, were examined. All live births at more than 24 weeks of gestation with data on outcome and confounders were divided into two comparison groups: 1) those with a chromosomal or structural abnormality (birth defect) and 2) those with no abnormality detected in chromosomes or anatomy. Propensity scores were used to balance the groups, account for confounding, and reduce the bias of a large number of potential confounding factors in the assessment of the impact of a birth defect on outcome. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied. Results: A singleton liveborn infant with a birth defect was 2.7 times more likely to be delivered preterm before 37 weeks. of gestation (95% confidence interval [Cl] 2.3-3.2), 7.0 times more likely to be delivered preterm before 34 weeks (95% Cl 5.5-8.9), and 11.5 times more likely to be delivered very preterm before 32 weeks (95% Cl 8.7-15.2). A singleton liveborn with a birth defect was 3.6 times more likely to have low birth weight at less than 2,500 g (95% Cl 3.0-4.3) and 11.3 times more likely to be very low birth weight at less than 1,500 g (95% Cl 8.5-15.1). Conclusion: Birth defects are associated with preterm birth and low birth weight after controlling for multiple confounding factors, including shared risk factors and pregnancy complications, using propensity scoring adjustment in multivariable regression analysis. The independent effects of risk factors on perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth and low birth weight, usually complicated by numerous confounding factors, may benefit from the application of this methodology, which can be used to minimize bias and account for confounding. Furthermore, this suggests that clinical and public health interventions aimed at preventing birth defects may have added benefits in preventing preterm birth and low birth weight.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Outcome after preterm delivery of infants antenatally diagnosed with congenital heart disease [J].
Andrews, RE ;
Simpson, JM ;
Sharland, GK ;
Sullivan, ID ;
Yates, RWM .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2006, 148 (02) :213-216
[3]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PRETERM BIRTH [J].
BERKOWITZ, GS ;
PAPIERNIK, E .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1993, 15 (02) :414-443
[4]  
*CDCP, BIRTH DEF FREQ ASK Q
[5]   MATERNAL COCAINE USE DURING EARLY-PREGNANCY AS A RISK FACTOR FOR CONGENITAL UROGENITAL ANOMALIES [J].
CHAVEZ, GF ;
MULINARE, J ;
CORDERO, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (06) :795-798
[6]  
D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-B
[8]   FOLATE LEVELS AND NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTION [J].
DALY, LE ;
KIRKE, PN ;
MOLLOY, A ;
WEIR, DG ;
SCOTT, JM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (21) :1698-1702
[9]   Epidemiologic approaches to identifying environmental causes of birth defects [J].
Dolk, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 125C (01) :4-11
[10]   The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. [J].
Hansen, M ;
Kurinczuk, JJ ;
Bower, C ;
Webb, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (10) :725-730