Dichotomy in carbon dioxide emissions - the case of India

被引:6
作者
Amjath-Babu, T. S. [1 ]
Kaechele, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Socioecon, D-15374 Muencheberg, Germany
关键词
emission per capita; rural India; lifestyle; emission dichotomy; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; COUNTRIES; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/17565529.2014.900602
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article aims to unravel the reasons behind the dichotomy in carbon dioxide emissions in India; that is, a high level of aggregate emissions, on the one hand, and, on the other, lower per capita emissions that cannot simply be explained by large population size. Firstly, the article analyses in detail the various factors that lead to larger aggregate emissions. In the case of electricity use, which is a major source of emissions, the role of factors on both the demand and supply sides are analysed. Also, the factors that influence emissions related to petroleum consumption are then reviewed. In contrast to previous studies, this article examines in detail the features that allow the low per capita emission level in India. This set of features includes the rural-urban divide, the spatial divide in energy-based emissions, poverty and energy access, lifestyle, societal organization, dependence on biomass, informal recycling, etc. This article concludes that inefficiencies in energy conversion, transitions in choices on the modes of transport, and policy failures are major factors in enlarging aggregate emissions. It also appears that positive features such as efficient societal organization and simpler lifestyle as well as negative features such as inequality, poverty and unmet demands, are bringing down per capita emissions. The insights gained from the analysis are used to highlight choices for a low carbon future.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 174
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Municipal solid waste recycling and associated markets in Delhi, India [J].
Agarwal, A ;
Singhmar, A ;
Kulshrestha, M ;
Mittal, AK .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2005, 44 (01) :73-90
[2]   Options for Achieving a 50% Cut in Industrial Carbon Emissions by 2050 [J].
Allwood, Julian M. ;
Cullen, Jonathan M. ;
Milford, Rachel L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (06) :1888-1894
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WORLD EN OUTL 2007
[4]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[5]  
BAHS, 2006, BAS AN HUSB STAT
[6]   Atmospheric emissions from road transportation in India [J].
Baidya, S. ;
Borken-Kleefeld, J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (10) :3812-3822
[7]   Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries [J].
Bhattacharya, SC ;
Salam, PA .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (04) :305-317
[8]   Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy? [J].
Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3387-3397
[9]  
Bhushan C., 2010, LOW CARBON GROWTH OP
[10]  
Brander M, 2011, ELECT SPECIFIC EMISS