An audit of the incidence of arm lymphoedema after prophylactic level I/II axillary dissection without division of the pectoralis minor muscle

被引:43
作者
della Rovere, GQ [1 ]
Ahmad, I [1 ]
Singh, P [1 ]
Ashley, S [1 ]
Daniels, IR [1 ]
Mortimer, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Breast Unit, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
lymphoedema; breast cancer; axillary dissection; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1308/003588403321661299
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Lymphoedema is reported to occur in approximately one in four women following curative treatment for breast cancer. Reported rates are almost exclusively for level 1,2,3 axillary clearance with few data for the current practice of level 1,2 dissections. Swelling can affect the whole upper limb but frequently will remain restricted to hand, forearm or upper arm. The aims of this study were to determine incidence after level 1,2 dissection, degree and site of swelling and risk factors which might determine such incidences. Results were available on 198 patients. The cumulative prevalence of lymphoedema after level 1,2 dissections was 14% in the arm, 12% in the forearm and 16% in the hand, assuming a circumference difference of more than 5% indicated lymphoedema. Moderate lymphoedema representing more than 10% circumference difference was found in 1% (arm), 3.5% (forearm) and 0.5% in the hand. Risk factors for lymphoedema were experience of the surgeon (upper arm only), dominant limb (forearm only) and right-sided cancer treatment (for hand only). When lymphoedema in any site was considered, right-sided treatment and nodal status were independently significant. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that lymphoedema is a common complication following level 1,2 dissection. Whole limb volume is often considered the main outcome measure for detecting lymphoedema and determining success of treatment, yet swelling may be restricted to regions of the limb and site specific circumference measurements are therefore recommended. Pre- and postoperative circumference measurements are likely to be the most sensitive way of determining presence of lymphoedema following surgery for breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 161
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BALL ABS, 1992, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V74, P126
[2]  
Clark R, 1997, Nurs Prax N Z, V12, P4
[3]   Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer [J].
Duff, M ;
Hill, ADK ;
McGreal, G ;
Walsh, S ;
McDermott, EW ;
O'Higgins, NJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (01) :114-117
[4]  
HAAGENSEN DC, 1971, DIS BREAST, P718
[5]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma: a series of 100 consecutive patients [J].
Hettiaratchy, SP ;
Kang, N ;
O'Toole, G ;
Allan, R ;
Cook, MG ;
Powell, BWEM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 53 (07) :559-562
[6]   SWELLING OF ARM FOLLOWING RADICAL MASTECTOMY [J].
HUGHES, JH ;
PATEL, AR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1966, 53 (01) :4-+
[7]   RISK OF LYMPHEDEMA FOLLOWING THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
KISSIN, MW ;
DELLAROVERE, GQ ;
EASTON, D ;
WESTBURY, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (07) :580-584
[8]  
Mortimer PS, 1996, QJM-MON J ASSOC PHYS, V89, P377
[9]  
Petrek JA, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V83, P2776, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12B+<2776::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-V