Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: Emergency department communication in an academic medical center

被引:111
作者
Rhodes, KV
Vieth, T
He, T
Miller, A
Howes, DS
Bailey, O
Walter, L
Frankel, R
Levinson, W
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sect Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Hlth Serv Res Grp, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We characterize communication in an urban, academic medical center emergency department (ED) with regard to the timing and nature of the medical history survey and physical examination and discharge instructions. Methods: Audiotaping and coding of 93 ED encounters (62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, 31 discharges) with a convenience sample of 24 emergency medicine residents, 8 nurses, and 93 nonemergency adult patients. Results: Patients were 68% women and 84% black, with a mean age of 45 years. Emergency medicine providers were 70% men and 80% white. Of 62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, time spent on the introduction and medical history survey and physical examination averaged 7 minutes 31 seconds (range 1 to 20 minutes). Emergency medicine residents introduced themselves in only two thirds of encounters, rarely (8%) indicating their training status. Despite physician tendency (63%) to start with an open-ended question, only 20% of patients completed their presenting complaint without interruption. Average time to interruption (usually a closed question) was 12 seconds. Discharge instructions averaged 76 seconds (range 7 to 202 seconds). Information on diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care, use of medications, time-specified follow-up, and symptoms that should prompt return to the ED were each discussed less than 65% of the time. Only 16% of patients were asked whether they had questions, and there were no instances in which the provider confirmed patient understanding of the information. Conclusion: Academic EDs present unique challenges to effective communication. In our study, the physician-patient encounter was brief and lacking in important health information. Provision of patient-centered care in academic EDs will require more provider education and significant system support.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 267
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Crabtree BF, 1999, DOING QUALITATIVE RE
[2]  
Frankel Richard, 2000, LANGUAGE ACTION NEW, P289
[3]   Cracking the code: Theory and method in clinical communication analysis [J].
Frankel, RM .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2001, 13 (01) :101-110
[4]   PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH ON PROVIDER PATIENT COMMUNICATION [J].
INUI, TS ;
CARTER, WB .
MEDICAL CARE, 1985, 23 (05) :521-538
[5]   OUTCOME-BASED DOCTOR-PATIENT INTERACTION ANALYSIS .1. COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES [J].
INUI, TS ;
CARTER, WB ;
KUKULL, WA ;
HAIGH, VH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1982, 20 (06) :535-549
[6]   Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice [J].
Jordan, B ;
Henderson, A .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1995, 4 (01) :39-103
[7]   Physician-patient communication in the emergency department .1. [J].
Knopp, R ;
Rosenzweig, S ;
Bernstein, E ;
Totten, V .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 3 (11) :1065-1069
[8]  
KORSCH BM, 1968, PEDIATRICS, V42, P855
[9]   Spontaneous talking time at start of consultation in outpatient clinic:: cohort study [J].
Langewitz, W ;
Denz, M ;
Keller, A ;
Kiss, A ;
Rüttimann, S ;
Wössmer, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7366) :682-+
[10]   DOCTOR-PATIENT COMMUNICATION - THE TORONTO CONSENSUS STATEMENT [J].
SIMPSON, M ;
BUCKMAN, R ;
STEWART, M ;
MAGUIRE, P ;
LIPKIN, M ;
NOVACK, D ;
TILL, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6814) :1385-1387