Dynamic neural activity recorded from human amygdala during fear conditioning using magnetoencephalography

被引:38
作者
Moses, Sandra N.
Houck, Jon M.
Martin, Tim
Hanlon, Faith M.
Ryan, Jennifer D.
Thoma, Robert J.
Weisend, Michael P.
Jackson, Eric M.
Pekkonen, Eero
Tesche, Claudia D.
机构
[1] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Psychol, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Neurol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, BioMag Lab, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Mental Illness & Neurosci Discovery Inst, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
amygdala; magnetoencephalography; fear conditioning; classical conditioning; associative learning; dynamic activity;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.016
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record the dynamics of arnygdala neuronal population activity during fear conditioning in human participants. Activation during conditioning training was compared to habituation and extinction sessions. Conditioned stimuli (CS) were visually presented geometric figures, and unconditioned stimuli (US) were aversive white-noise bursts. The CS+ was paired with the US on 50% of presentations and the CS- was never paired. The precise temporal resolution of MEG allowed us to address the issue of whether the amygdala responds to the onset or offset of the CS+, and/or the expectation of the initiation or offset of the an omitted auditory US. Fear conditioning elicited differential amygdala activation for the unpaired CS+ compared to the CS-, extinction and habituation. This was especially robust in the right hemisphere at CS onset. The strongest peaks of amygdala activity occurred at an average of 270 ms in the right and 306 ms in the left hemisphere following unpaired CS+ onset, and following offset at 21 ms in the left and 161 ms in the right (corresponding to an interval of 108 ms and 248 ms after the anticipated onset of the US, respectively). However, the earliest peaks in this epoch preceded US onset in most subjects. Thus, the activity dynamics suggest that the amygdala both differentially responds to stimuli and anticipates the arrival of stimuli based on prior learning of contingencies. The amygdala also shows stimulus omission-related activation that could potentially provide feedback about experienced stimulus contingencies to modify future responding during learning and extinction. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 460
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   122-CHANNEL SQUID INSTRUMENT FOR INVESTIGATING THE MAGNETIC SIGNALS FROM THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
AHONEN, AI ;
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
KAJOLA, MJ ;
KNUUTILA, JET ;
LAINE, PP ;
LOUNASMAA, OV ;
PARKKONEN, LT ;
SIMOLA, JT ;
TESCHE, CD .
PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1993, T49A :198-205
[2]   MULTIPLE UNIT-ACTIVITY RECORDED FROM AMYGDALA CENTRAL NUCLEUS DURING PAVLOVIAN HEART-RATE CONDITIONING IN RABBIT [J].
APPLEGATE, CD ;
FRYSINGER, RC ;
KAPP, BS ;
GALLAGHER, M .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1982, 238 (02) :457-462
[3]  
Armony JL, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P2592
[4]   Neuromagnetic recordings in temporal lobe epilepsy [J].
Baumgartner, C ;
Pataraia, E ;
Lindinger, G ;
Deecke, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 17 (02) :177-189
[5]   DOUBLE DISSOCIATION OF CONDITIONING AND DECLARATIVE KNOWLEDGE RELATIVE TO THE AMYGDALA AND HIPPOCAMPUS IN HUMANS [J].
BECHARA, A ;
TRANEL, D ;
DAMASIO, H ;
ADOLPHS, R ;
ROCKLAND, C ;
DAMASIO, AR .
SCIENCE, 1995, 269 (5227) :1115-1118
[6]   Phase shift detection in thalamocortical oscillations using magnetoencephalography in humans [J].
Bish, JP ;
Martin, T ;
Houck, J ;
Ilmoniemi, RJ ;
Tesche, C .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 362 (01) :48-52
[7]  
Büchel C, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P10869
[8]   Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning:: an event-related fMRI study [J].
Büchel, C ;
Morris, J ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Friston, KJ .
NEURON, 1998, 20 (05) :947-957
[9]   Functional MRI of human amygdala activity during Pavlovian fear conditioning: Stimulus processing versus response expression [J].
Cheng, DT ;
Knight, DC ;
Smith, CN ;
Stein, EA ;
Helmstetter, FJ .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 117 (01) :3-10
[10]  
Choi JS, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P8713