Steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-methadone in methadone maintenance patients

被引:106
作者
Foster, DJR [1 ]
Somogyi, AA
Dyer, KR
White, JM
Bochner, F
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Clin & Expt Pharmacol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine; drug dependence; metabolism; methadone; pharmacokinetics; protein binding; stereoselectivity;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00272.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-methadone in a methadone maintenance population. Methods Eighteen patients recruited from a public methadone maintenance program underwent an interdosing interval pharmacokinetic study. Plasma and urine samples were collected and analysed for methadone and its major metabolite (EDDP) using stereoselective h.p.l.c. Methadone plasma protein binding was examined using ultrafiltration, and plasma alpha (1)-acid glycoprotein concentrations were quantified by radial immunoassay. Results (R)-methadone had a significantly (P < 0.05) greater unbound fraction (mean 173%) and total renal clearance (182%) compared with (S)-methadone, while maximum measured plasma concentrations (83%) and apparent partial clearance of methadone to EDDP (76%) were significantly (P < 0.001) lower. When protein binding was considered (R)-methadone plasma clearance of the unbound fraction (59%) and apparent partial intrinsic clearance to EDDP (44%) were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than for (S)-methadone, while AUC(tauu)(ss) (167%) was significantly (P < 0.001) greater. There were no significant (P > 0.2) differences between the methadone enantiomers for AUC(tau)(ss), steady-state plasma clearance, trough plasma concentrations and unbound renal clearance. Patients excreted significantly (P < 0.0001) more (R)-methadone and (S)-EDDP than the corresponding enantiomers. Considerable interindividual variability was observed for the pharmacokinetic parameters, with coefficients of variation of up to 70%. Conclusions Steady-state pharmacokinetics of unbound methadone are stereoselective, and there is large interindividual variability consistent with CYP3A4 mediated metabolism to the major metabolite EDDP; the variability did not obscure a significant dose-plasma concentration relationship. Stereoselective differences in the pharmacokinetics of methadone may have important implications for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling but is unlikely to be important for therapeutic drug monitoring of methadone, in the setting of opioid dependence.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 440
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   METHADONE PLASMA-PROTEIN BINDING - ALTERATIONS IN CANCER AND DISPLACEMENT FROM ALPHA-ACID GLYCOPROTEIN [J].
ABRAMSON, FP .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1982, 32 (05) :652-658
[2]  
ANGGARD E, 1975, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V17, P258
[3]   CHIRAL ANALYSIS OF METHADONE IN PLASMA BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
BECK, O ;
BOREUS, LO ;
LAFOLIE, P ;
JACOBSSON, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY-BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 1991, 570 (01) :198-202
[4]  
BELLWARD GD, 1977, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V22, P92
[5]   FITTING STRAIGHT LINES TO EXPERIMENTAL-DATA [J].
BRACE, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 233 (03) :R94-R99
[6]  
Chauret N, 1997, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V25, P1130
[7]  
Dole VP, 1965, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V193, P80
[8]   Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in methadone maintenance patients: Comparison of those who do and do not experience withdrawal and concentration-effect relationships [J].
Dyer, KR ;
Foster, DJR ;
White, JM ;
Somogyi, AA ;
Menelaou, A ;
Bochner, F .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (06) :685-694
[9]  
EAP CB, 1988, N-S ARCH PHARMACOL, V337, P220
[10]   BINDING OF D-METHADONE, L-METHADONE, AND DL-METHADONE TO PROTEINS IN PLASMA OF HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS - ROLE OF THE VARIANTS OF ALPHA-1-ACID GLYCOPROTEIN [J].
EAP, CB ;
CUENDET, C ;
BAUMANN, P .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1990, 47 (03) :338-346