Physical rehabilitation following medicare prospective payment for skilled nursing facilities

被引:30
作者
Wodchis, WP
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Ctr, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M6K 2R7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
prospective payment system; case-mix payment; nursing homes; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00291.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To examine the effect of the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNF) on the delivery of rehabilitation therapy to residents. Data Sources. Resident-level data are based on the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set for nursing facilities. All elderly residents admitted to SNFs in Michigan and Ohio in 1998 and 1999 form the study population (n=99,952). Study Design. A differences-in-differences identification strategy is used to compare rehabilitation therapy for SNF residents before and after a change in Medicare SNF payment. Logistic and linear regression analyses are used to examine the effect of PPS on receipt of physical, occupational, or speech therapy and total therapy time. Data Extraction. Data for the present study were extracted from the University of Michigan Assessment Archive Project (UMAAP). One assessment was obtained for each resident admitted to nursing facilities during the study period. Principal Findings. The introduction of PPS for all U.S. Medicare residents in July of 1998 was associated with specific targeting of rehabilitation treatment time to the most profitable levels of therapy. The PPS was also associated with increased likelihood of therapy but less rehabilitation therapy time for Medicare residents. Conclusions. The present results indicate that rehabilitation therapy is sensitive to the specific payment incentives associated with PPS.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1318
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[2]  
*AM NURS ASS, 2000, PROSP PAYM SYST LONG
[3]  
COBURN AF, 1993, HEALTH SERV RES, V28, P45
[4]  
COHEN JW, 1990, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V27, P183
[5]   The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes [J].
Cohen, JW ;
Spector, WD .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (01) :23-48
[6]  
*CTR MED MED SERV, 2002, NAT HLTH CAR EXP TAB
[7]   REFINING A CASE-MIX MEASURE FOR NURSING-HOMES - RESOURCE UTILIZATION GROUPS (RUG-III) [J].
FRIES, BE ;
SCHNEIDER, DP ;
FOLEY, WJ ;
GAVAZZI, M ;
BURKE, R ;
CORNELIUS, E .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (07) :668-685
[8]   Medicaid reimbursement and the quality of nursing home care [J].
Grabowski, DC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (04) :549-569
[9]  
Grimaldi P L, 1999, J Health Care Finance, V25, P1
[10]  
Grimaldi Paul L, 2002, J Health Care Finance, V28, P49