Risk-maps informing land-use planning processes - A survey on the Netherlands and the United Kingdom recent developments

被引:36
作者
Basta, Claudia
Neuvel, Jeroen M. M.
Zlatanova, Sisi
Ale, Ben
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, DIRC Sustainable Urban Areas, Sect Mat Sci & Sustainable Construct, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Sect GISt, OTB Res Inst Housing Urban & Mobil Studies, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[4] Delft Univ Technol, TBM Fac, Safety Sci Grp, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
land-use planning; geographic information systems; seveso II; risk-maps;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The definition of safety distances as required by Art 12 of the Seveso, II Directive on dangerous substances (96/82/EC) is necessary to minimize the consequences of potential major accidents. As they affect the land-use destinations of involved areas, safety distances can be considered as risk tolerability criteria with a territorial reflection. Recent studies explored the suitability of using Geographical Information System technologies to support their elaboration and visual rendering. In particular, the elaboration of GIS "risk-maps" has been recognized as functional to two objectives: connecting spatial planners and safety experts during decision making processes and communicating risk to non-experts audiences. In order to elaborate on these findings and to verify their reflection on European practices, the article presents the result of a comparative study between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands recent developments. Their land-use planning practices for areas falling under Seveso 11 requirements are explored. The role of GIS risk-maps within decisional processes is analyzed and the reflection on the transparency and accessibility of risk-information is commented. Recommendations for further developments are given. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Tolerable or acceptable: A comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands [J].
Ale, BJM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (02) :231-241
[2]   Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands [J].
Ale, BJM .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (1-4) :105-126
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GEO INFORM DISASTER, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-27468-5_79
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, OFF J EUR UNION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, RULE ORDER DUTCH PLA
[6]  
BAKKER W, 1999, RUIMTE ROND REGELS S
[7]  
BALMFORTH H, 2005, RAS0501 HSL
[8]  
BASTA C, P ANN M SOC RISK AN
[9]   Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands [J].
Bottelberghs, PH .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :59-84
[10]   The control of major accident hazards: The land-use planning issue [J].
Christou, MD ;
Amendola, A ;
Smeder, M .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1999, 65 (1-2) :151-178