PCRPi: Presaging Critical Residues in Protein interfaces, a new computational tool to chart hot spots in protein interfaces

被引:59
作者
Assi, Salam A. [1 ]
Tanaka, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Rabbitts, Terence H. [1 ]
Fernandez-Fuentes, Narcis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Mol Med, Sect Expt Therapeut, St Jamess Univ Hosp, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CONSERVED RESIDUES; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BINDING INTERFACE; DRUG DESIGN; FREE-ENERGY; IDENTIFICATION; DATABASE; REGIONS; SITES; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkp1158
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are ubiquitous in Biology, and thus offer an enormous potential for the discovery of novel therapeutics. Although protein interfaces are large and lack defining physiochemical traits, is well established that only a small portion of interface residues, the so-called hot spot residues, contribute the most to the binding energy of the protein complex. Moreover, recent successes in development of novel drugs aimed at disrupting PPIs rely on targeting such residues. Experimental methods for describing critical residues are lengthy and costly; therefore, there is a need for computational tools that can complement experimental efforts. Here, we describe a new computational approach to predict hot spot residues in protein interfaces. The method, called Presaging Critical Residues in Protein interfaces (PCRPi), depends on the integration of diverse metrics into a unique probabilistic measure by using Bayesian Networks. We have benchmarked our method using a large set of experimentally verified hot spot residues and on a blind prediction on the protein complex formed by HRAS protein and a single domain antibody. Under both scenarios, PCRPi delivered consistent and accurate predictions. Finally, PCRPi is able to handle cases where some of the input data is either missing or not reliable (e.g. evolutionary information).
引用
收藏
页码:e86.1 / e86.11
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   Structural biology and bioinformatics in drug design: opportunities and challenges for target identification and lead discovery [J].
Blundell, TL ;
Sibanda, BL ;
Montalvao, RW ;
Brewerton, S ;
Chelliah, V ;
Worth, CL ;
Harmer, NJ ;
Davies, O ;
Burke, D .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 361 (1467) :413-423
[3]   Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces [J].
Bogan, AA ;
Thorn, KS .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 280 (01) :1-9
[4]  
BOTTCHER SG, 2003, J STAT SOFTW, V8, P1
[5]   Insights into protein-protein interfaces using a Bayesian network prediction method [J].
Bradford, James R. ;
Needham, Chris J. ;
Bulpitt, Andrew J. ;
Westhead, David R. .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2006, 362 (02) :365-386
[6]   Modeling splice sites with Bayes networks [J].
Cai, DY ;
Delcher, A ;
Kao, B ;
Kasif, S .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (02) :152-158
[7]   A HOT-SPOT OF BINDING-ENERGY IN A HORMONE-RECEPTOR INTERFACE [J].
CLACKSON, T ;
WELLS, JA .
SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5196) :383-386
[8]   An automated decision-tree approach to predicting protein interaction hot spots [J].
Darnell, Steven J. ;
Page, David ;
Mitchell, Julie C. .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 68 (04) :813-823
[9]   Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges [J].
DeLano, WL .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :14-20
[10]  
Edwards AWF, 1997, STAT SCI, V12, P177