Effects of differences in risk aversion on the distribution of wealth

被引:6
作者
Coen-Pirani, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Off 336, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
wealth distribution; risk aversion; heterogeneous agents;
D O I
10.1017/S1365100504040052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the role played by differences in risk aversion in affecting the long-run distribution of wealth across agents in the context of an endowment economy. The economy is populated by two types of Epstein-Zin agents who differ only in their attitudes toward risk. By choosing riskier portfolio strategies, less-risk-averse agents enjoy returns on their investments characterized by a higher mean and a higher variance than the ones enjoyed by more-risk-averse agents. The former effect tends to make less-risk-averse agents wealthier over time, whereas the latter tends to make them poorer. The paper shows that, contrary to the results obtained using standard expected utility preferences, for some parameter values the long-run distribution of wealth is dominated by more-risk-averse agents.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 632
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ANDERSON E, 1998, MIMEO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NUMERICAL RECIPES FO
[4]  
CAMPBELL JY, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P487
[5]  
COENPIRANI D, IN PRESS J MONETARY
[6]   Two-Person Dynamic Equilibrium in the Capital Market [J].
Dumas, Bernard .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1989, 2 (02) :157-188
[7]   RISK-AVERSION AND ASSET PRICES [J].
EPSTEIN, LG .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1988, 22 (02) :179-192
[8]   THE RATE OF TIME PREFERENCE AND DYNAMIC ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS [J].
EPSTEIN, LG ;
HYNES, JA .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1983, 91 (04) :611-635
[9]   SUBSTITUTION, RISK-AVERSION, AND THE TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR OF CONSUMPTION AND ASSET RETURNS - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
EPSTEIN, LG ;
ZIN, SE .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (02) :263-286
[10]   SUBSTITUTION, RISK-AVERSION, AND THE TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR OF CONSUMPTION AND ASSET RETURNS - A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK [J].
EPSTEIN, LG ;
ZIN, SE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (04) :937-969