Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery

被引:281
作者
Cummins, CA
Murrell, GAC
机构
[1] Lake Cook Orthopaed Associates, Barrington, IL 60010 USA
[2] Orthopaed Res Inst, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mse.2003.21
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. After surgical repair, there is a significant re-tear rote (25%-90%). The aim of this study was to determine the primary mode of mechanical failure for rotator cuffs repaired with suture anchors of the time of revision rotator cuff repair. We prospectively followed 342 consecutive torn rotator cuffs, repaired by a single surgeon using suture anchors and a mattress-suturing configuration. Of those shoulders, 21 (6%) subsequently underwent a revision rotator cuff repair by the original surgeon, and 1 underwent a second revision repair. Intraoperative findings, including the mode of failure, were systematically recorded at revision surgery and compared with the findings at the primary repair. In addition, 81 primary rotator cuff repairs had a radiographic and fluoroscopic evaluation at a mean of 37 weeks after repair to assess for any loosening or migration of the anchors. At revision rotator cuff repair, the predominant mode of failure was tendon pulling through sutures (19/22 shoulders) (P < .001). Two recurrent tears occurred in a new location adjacent to the previous repair, and one anchor was found loose in the supraspinatus tendon. The mean size of the rotator cuff tear was larger at the revision surgery (P = .043), the tendon quality ranked poorer (P = .013), and the tendon mobility decreased (P = .002), as compared with the index procedure. The radiographs and fluoroscopic examination showed that all 335 anchors in 81 patients were in bone. Rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors that underwent revision surgery foiled mechanically by three mechanisms, the most common of which was tendon pulling through sutures. This suggests that the weak link in rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and horizontal mattress sutures, as determined of revision surgery, is the tendon-suture interface.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   THE STRENGTH OF ARTIFICIAL LIGAMENT ANCHORAGES - A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
AMIS, AA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (03) :397-403
[2]   OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF FAILED REPAIRS OF THE ROTATOR CUFF [J].
BIGLIANI, LU ;
CORDASCO, FA ;
MCILVEEN, SJ ;
MUSSO, ES .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (10) :1505-1515
[3]   A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears [J].
Bryant, L ;
Shnier, R ;
Bryant, C ;
Murrell, GAC .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (03) :219-224
[4]   Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation [J].
Burkhart, SS ;
Pagan, JLD ;
Wirth, MA ;
Athanasiou, KA .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1997, 13 (06) :720-724
[5]   Strength of fixation with transosseous sutures in rotator cuff repair [J].
Caldwell, GL ;
Warner, JJP ;
Miller, MD ;
Boardman, D ;
Towers, J ;
Debski, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (07) :1064-1068
[6]   ARTHROGRAPHY OF THE SHOULDER AFTER OPERATIVE REPAIR OF THE TORN ROTATOR CUFF [J].
CALVERT, PT ;
PACKER, NP ;
STOKER, DJ ;
BAYLEY, JIL ;
KESSEL, L .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (01) :147-150
[7]  
CUMMINS CA, ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
[8]  
CUMMINS CA, 2002, AM SHOULD ELB SOC BI
[9]   RESULTS OF A 2ND ATTEMPT AT SURGICAL REPAIR OF A FAILED INITIAL ROTATOR-CUFF REPAIR [J].
DEORIO, JK ;
COFIELD, RH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (04) :563-567
[10]   BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF ROTATOR CUFF FIXATION METHODS [J].
FRANCE, EP ;
PAULOS, LE ;
HARNER, CD ;
STRAIGHT, CB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (02) :176-181