Progression risk, urinary protein excretion, and treatment effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in nondiabetic kidney disease

被引:125
作者
Kent, David M.
Jafar, Tazeen H.
Hayward, Rodney A.
Tighiouart, Hocine
Landa, Marcia
de Jong, Paul
de Zeeuw, Dick
Remuzzi, Giuseppe
Kamper, Anne-Lise
Levey, Andrew S.
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Med, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Groningen, Dept Internal Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Inst Rech Farmacol Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Nephrol, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2007年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1681/ASN.2006101081
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
it is unclear whether patients with nondiabetic kidney disease benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy when they are at low risk for disease progression or when they have low urinary protein excretion. With the use of a combined database from 11 randomized, clinical trials (n = 1860), a Cox proportional hazards model, based on known predictors of risk and the composite outcome kidney failure or creatinine doubling, was developed and used to stratify patients into equal-sized quartiles of risk. Outcome risk and treatment effect were examined across various risk strata. Use of this risk model for targeting ACEI therapy was also compared with a strategy based on urinary protein excretion alone. Control patients in the highest quartile of predicted risk had an annualized outcome rate of 28.7%, whereas control patients in the lowest quartile of predicted risk had an annualized outcome rate of 0.4%. Despite the extreme variation in risk, there was no variation in the degree of benefit of ACEI therapy (P = 0.93 for the treatment X risk interaction). Significant interaction was detected between baseline urine protein and ACEI therapy (P = 0.003). When patients were stratified according to their baseline urinary protein excretion, among the subgroup of patients with proteinuria >= 500 mg/d, significant treatment effect was seen across all patients with a measurable outcome risk, including those at relatively low risk (1.7% annualized risk for progression). However, there was no benefit of ACEI therapy among patients with proteinuria < 500 mg/d, even among higher risk patients (control outcome rate 19.7%). Patients with nondiabetic kidney disease vary considerably in their risk for disease progression, but the treatment effect of ACEI does not vary across risk strata. Patients with proteinuria < 500 mg/d do not seem to benefit, even when at relatively high risk for progression.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1965
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria [J].
Asselbergs, FW ;
Diercks, GFH ;
Hillege, HL ;
van Boven, AJ ;
Janssen, WMT ;
Voors, AA ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
de Jong, PE ;
van Veldhuisen, DJ ;
van Gilst, WH .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (18) :2809-2816
[2]  
BANNISTER KM, 1995, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V111, P184
[3]  
Braunwald E, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P2058
[4]   Effect of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and other anti hypertensive drugs on renal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Casas, JP ;
Chua, WL ;
Loukogeorgakis, S ;
Vallance, P ;
Smeeth, L ;
Hingorani, AD ;
MacAllister, RJ .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9502) :2026-2033
[5]   Should all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A meta-analysis of individual patient data [J].
Chaturvedi, N .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (05) :370-379
[6]   Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among US adults, 1999 to 2000 [J].
Coresh, J ;
Byrd-Holt, D ;
Astor, BC ;
Briggs, JP ;
Eggers, PW ;
Lacher, DA ;
Hostetter, TH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :180-188
[7]   Screening, monitoring, and treatment of albuminuria: Public health perspectives [J].
de Jong, Paul E. ;
Curhan, Gary C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 17 (08) :2120-2126
[8]   A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease [J].
Drey, N ;
Roderick, P ;
Mullee, M ;
Rogerson, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 42 (04) :677-684
[9]   K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Levin, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) :S14-S266
[10]   Early detection of progressive chronic kidney disease: Is it feasible? [J].
Gansevoort, Ron T. ;
Bakker, Stephan J. L. ;
De Jong, Paul E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 17 (05) :1218-1220