Public Trust in Government Concerning Tobacco Control in Japan

被引:34
作者
Nakayachi, Kazuya [1 ]
Cvetkovich, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Doshisha Univ, Dept Psychol, Kamigyo Ku, Kyoto 6028580, Japan
[2] Western Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Competence; fairness; tobacco control; trust; value similarity; SOCIAL TRUST; RISK; VALUES; MODEL; PERCEPTION; DIMENSIONALITY; CREDIBILITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01306.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study investigated public trust and its determinants concerning the government's control of tobacco in Japan. We focused on the two issues of government policies to ban smoking by minors and increase taxes on tobacco. We conducted a questionnaire survey in which respondents were asked to assess their trust in the government, the government's fairness and competency, and their value similarity with the government. One thousand three hundred and ninety-four respondents agreed to participate in the survey out of 2,600 randomly sampled adults over 20 years old from all over Japan. The results of multiple regression analysis confirmed that value similarity is the strongest predictor of public trust in the government. On the affirmatively supported issue of prohibiting smoking among minors, the results further indicated that assessment of competency is a stronger predictor than assessment of fairness. In contrast, assessment of fairness is a stronger predictor than assessment of competency for the still divided issue of increasing tobacco tax. Respondents who had low concern and had not formed clear opinions on the issues showed a weak link between assessment of value similarity and trust. Based on these findings, we considered the implications for the government's implementation of tobacco controls.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: The case of GM food [J].
Allum, Nick .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (04) :935-946
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion
[3]  
[Anonymous], ROL FOOD SAF COMM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRUST RISK MANAGEMEN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849776592-17
[5]  
Barber B., 1983, The logic and limit of trust
[6]   Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations [J].
Bardi, A ;
Schwartz, SH .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (10) :1207-1220
[8]   Environmental values, beliefs, and actions - A situational approach [J].
Corraliza, JA ;
Berenguer, J .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 32 (06) :832-848
[9]  
Covello V., 1992, HLTH ENV DIGEST, V6, P1
[10]  
CUMMINGS LL, 1996, TRUST ORG, P68