Sex differences in lung cancer survival: Do tumors behave differently in elderly women?

被引:128
作者
Wisnivesky, Juan P.
Halm, Ethan A.
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Sleep Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1455
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Women with lung cancer appear to have better survival. Whether this results from better response to treatment, different tumor biology, or a longer life expectancy is not well understood. This study sought to assess sex differences in the natural history of lung cancer after controlling for unrelated causes of death and type of treatment. Methods This study included 18,967 elderly patients with stage I and II non - small-cell lung cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare records. Patients were grouped into three categories according to the treatment received: surgery, radiation or chemotherapy but no surgery, and untreated cases. We used stratified and multivariate analyses to evaluate sex differences in survival using three methods to control for competing risks: lung cancer - specific survival, overall survival adjusting for comorbidities, and relative survival. Sensitivity analysis was used to test whether potential differences in smoking could account for the observed association of sex with survival. Results Women in all treatment groups had better lung cancer - specific, overall, and relative survival than did men ( P <.0001). Stratified and multivariate analyses showed that women had better survival than did men after controlling for confounders. Sensitivity analyses showed that potential sex differences in smoking did not explain our findings. Conclusion In this national, population-based sample, elderly women with early lung cancer had better risk-adjusted survival regardless of the type of treatment. That sex differences were observed among untreated patients suggests that lung cancer in women may have a different natural history.
引用
收藏
页码:1705 / 1712
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   DETERMINANTS OF IMPROVED OUTCOME IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - AN ANALYSIS OF THE 2,580-PATIENT SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP DATA-BASE [J].
ALBAIN, KS ;
CROWLEY, JJ ;
LEBLANC, M ;
LIVINGSTON, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (09) :1563-1574
[2]   Do women live longer following lung resection for carcinoma? [J].
Alexiou, C ;
Onyeaka, CVP ;
Beggs, D ;
Akar, R ;
Beggs, L ;
Salama, FD ;
Duffy, JP ;
Morgan, WE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 21 (02) :319-325
[3]   The female gender has a positive effect on survival independent of background life expectancy following surgical resection of primary non-small cell lung cancer:: a study of absolute and relative survival over 15 years [J].
Båtevik, R ;
Grong, K ;
Segadal, L ;
Stangeland, L .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 47 (02) :173-181
[4]   Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer - A decade of progress [J].
Brundage, MD ;
Davies, D ;
Mackillop, WJ .
CHEST, 2002, 122 (03) :1037-1057
[5]   Variations in hospitalization rates among nursing home residents: The role of discretionary hospitalizations [J].
Carter, MW .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (04) :1177-1206
[6]  
Cooper GS, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P43
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]   COVARIANCE ANALYSIS OF HEART-TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL DATA [J].
CROWLEY, J ;
HU, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 72 (357) :27-36
[9]   Sex differences in presentation, management, and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma [J].
de Perrot, M ;
Licker, M ;
Bouchardy, C ;
Usel, M ;
Robert, J ;
Spiliopoulos, A .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 119 (01) :21-26
[10]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619