Computer-aided measurement of liver volumes in CT by means of geodesic active contour segmentation coupled with level-set algorithms

被引:78
作者
Suzuki, Kenji [1 ]
Kohlbrenner, Ryan [1 ]
Epstein, Mark L. [1 ]
Obajuluwa, Ademola M. [1 ]
Xu, Jianwu [1 ]
Hori, Masatoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
computerised tomography; differential geometry; feature extraction; filtering theory; image enhancement; image segmentation; liver; medical image processing; volume measurement; TRANSPLANTATION; TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1118/1.3395579
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Methods: The authors developed a computerized liver extraction scheme based on geodesic active contour segmentation coupled with level-set contour evolution. First, an anisotropic diffusion filter was applied to portal-venous-phase CT images for noise reduction while preserving the liver structure, followed by a scale-specific gradient magnitude filter to enhance the liver boundaries. Then, a nonlinear grayscale converter enhanced the contrast of the liver parenchyma. By using the liver-parenchyma-enhanced image as a speed function, a fast-marching level-set algorithm generated an initial contour that roughly estimated the liver shape. A geodesic active contour segmentation algorithm coupled with level-set contour evolution refined the initial contour to define the liver boundaries more precisely. The liver volume was then calculated using these refined boundaries. Hepatic CT scans of 15 prospective liver donors were obtained under a liver transplant protocol with a multidetector CT system. The liver volumes extracted by the computerized scheme were compared to those traced manually by a radiologist, used as "gold standard." Results: The mean liver volume obtained with our scheme was 1504 cc, whereas the mean gold standard manual volume was 1457 cc, resulting in a mean absolute difference of 105 cc (7.2%). The computer-estimated liver volumetrics agreed excellently with the gold-standard manual volumetrics (intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95) with no statistically significant difference (F=0.77; p(F < f)=0.32). The average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and percent volume error were 98.4%, 91.1%, 99.1%, and 7.2%, respectively. Computerized CT liver volumetry would require substantially less completion time (compared to an average of 39 min per case by manual segmentation). Conclusions: The computerized liver extraction scheme provides an efficient and accurate way of measuring liver volumes in CT.
引用
收藏
页码:2159 / 2166
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science
[2]   AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF LIVER STRUCTURE IN CT IMAGES [J].
BAE, KT ;
GIGER, ML ;
CHEN, CT ;
KAHN, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (01) :71-78
[3]   Medical image segmentation with knowledge-guided robust active contours [J].
Boscolo, R ;
Brown, MS ;
McNitt-Gray, MF .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (02) :437-448
[4]   Geodesic active contours [J].
Caselles, V ;
Kimmel, R ;
Sapiro, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1997, 22 (01) :61-79
[5]   Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand - which one to choose? [J].
Changulani, Manish ;
Okonkwo, Ugochuku ;
Keswani, Tulsi ;
Kalairajah, Yegappan .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 32 (01) :1-6
[6]   Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging [J].
Doi, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 :S3-S19
[7]   Safety of multidetector computed tomography in calculating liver volume for living-donor liver transplantation [J].
Emiroglu, R. ;
Coskun, M. ;
Yilmaz, U. ;
Sevmis, S. ;
Ozcay, F. ;
Haberal, M. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) :3576-3578
[8]   Automatic liver segmentation technique for three-dimensional visualisation of CT data [J].
Gao, LM ;
Heath, DG ;
Kuszyk, BS ;
Fishman, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (02) :359-364
[9]   Update on the potential role of CAD in radiologic interpretations: Are we making progress? [J].
Giger, ML .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (06) :669-670
[10]   Fast connected-component labeling [J].
He, Lifeng ;
Chao, Yuyan ;
Suzuki, Kenji ;
Wu, Kesheng .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2009, 42 (09) :1977-1987