Field test of four methods for gas-phase ambient nitric acid

被引:18
作者
Arnold, J. R.
Hartsell, Benjamin E.
Luke, Winston T.
Ullah, S. M. Rahmat
Dasgupta, Purnendu K.
Huey, L. Greg
Tate, Paul
机构
[1] US EPA, Atmospher Sci Modeling Div, Air Resources Lab, NOAA,Off Res & Dev, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Atmospher Res & Anal Inc, Plano, TX USA
[3] NOAA, Air Resources Lab, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Chem, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Univ S Florida, Coll Hlth Sci, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
instrument intercomparison; NOy denuder difference; parallel plate diffusion scrubber; chemical ionization mass spectrometry; nitrogen dioxide interference;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three semi-continuous methods for detecting nitric acid (HNO3) were tested against the annular denuder + filter pack (ADS) integrated collection technique at the Tampa Bay Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE) Sydney research station similar to 20 km downwind of the Tampa, Florida, urban core. The semi-continuous instruments included: two slightly differing implementations of the NOY - NOY* (total oxides of nitrogen minus that total denuded of HNO3) denuder difference technique, one from the NOAA Air Resources Lab (ARL), and one from Atmospheric Research and Analysis, Inc. (ARA); the.parallel plate wet diffusion scrubber + online ion chromatography technique from Texas Tech University (TTU); and the chemical ionization mass spectrometer from the Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT). Twelve hour ADS samples were collected by the University of South Florida (USF). Results for 10 min samples computed from the various higher sampling frequencies of each semi-continuous instrument showed good agreement (R-2 > 0.7) for afternoon periods of the highest production and accumulation of HNO3. Further, agreement was within 30% for these instruments even at HNO3 concentrations < 0.30 ppb. The USF ADS results were biased low, however, by 44%, on average, compared to the corporate 12 h aggregated means from the semi-continuous methods, and by > 60% for the nighttime samples; ADS results were below the corporate mean maximum HNO3 concentration by > 30% as well. The four instruments using semi-continuous methods, by contrast, were all within 10% of each other's 12 h mean mixing ratios. While only ARA employed a formal minimum detection limit at 0.050ppb, error analysis with the other techniques established that at the same level of precision, TTU's effective limit was approximately the same as ARA's and that ARL's limit was 0.030 ppb; analysis for GIT showed no apparent effective limit at the levels of HNO3 encountered in this field study. The importance of sample inlet height for HNO3 measurements was indirectly shown through comparison to previous field work at this site when sample inlet heights ranged from 1.5-10m and produced systematic discrepancies in HNO3 concentrations correlated with height of more than a factor of 2. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4210 / 4226
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluated kinetic, photochemical and heterogeneous data for atmospheric chemistry .5. IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric Chemistry [J].
Atkinson, R ;
Baulch, DL ;
Cox, RA ;
Hampson, RF ;
Kerr, JA ;
Rossi, MJ ;
Troe, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL REFERENCE DATA, 1997, 26 (03) :521-1011
[2]   Field measurement of acid gases and soluble anions in atmospheric particulate matter using a parallel plate wet denuder and an alternating filter-based automated analysis system [J].
Boring, CB ;
Al-Horr, R ;
Genfa, Z ;
Dasgupta, PK ;
Martin, MW ;
Smith, WF .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 74 (06) :1256-1268
[3]   Introduction to special section: Southern Oxidants Study Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study, Part 2 [J].
Cowling, EB ;
Chameides, WL ;
Kiang, CS ;
Fehsenfeld, FC ;
Meagher, JF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D7) :9075-9077
[4]  
DeMore W. B., 1997, JPL PUBLICATION, V97-4
[5]   Ground-based intercomparison of nitric acid measurement techniques [J].
Fehsenfeld, FC ;
Huey, LG ;
Sueper, DT ;
Norton, RB ;
Williams, EJ ;
Eisele, FL ;
Mauldin, RL ;
Tanner, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D3) :3343-3353
[6]  
Finlayson-Pitts B. J., 2000, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere
[7]   Reactions of SiF5- with atmospheric trace gases: Ion chemistry for chemical ionization detection of HNO3 in the troposphere [J].
Huey, LG ;
Lovejoy, ER .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY AND ION PROCESSES, 1996, 155 (03) :133-140
[8]   CIMS measurements of HNO3 and SO2 at the South Pole during ISCAT 2000 [J].
Huey, LG ;
Tanner, DJ ;
Slusher, DL ;
Dibb, JE ;
Arimoto, R ;
Chen, G ;
Davis, D ;
Buhr, MP ;
Nowak, JB ;
Mauldin, RL ;
Eisele, FL ;
Kosciuch, E .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (32) :5411-5421
[9]   Fast time response measurements of HNO3 in air with a chemical ionization mass spectrometer [J].
Huey, LG ;
Dunlea, EJ ;
Lovejoy, ER ;
Hanson, DR ;
Norton, RB ;
Fehsenfeld, FC ;
Howard, CJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D3) :3355-3360
[10]   CHEMILUMINESCENCE METHOD FOR ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING OF NITRIC-ACID AND NITROGEN-OXIDES [J].
JOSEPH, DW ;
SPICER, CW .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1978, 50 (09) :1400-1403