Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model

被引:181
作者
Doherty, J [1 ]
Johnston, JM
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Dept Environm Engn, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] US EPA, ORD, NERL, Ecosyst Res Div, Athens, GA 30605 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
mathematical modeling; HSPF; parameter estimation; PEST; model calibration; uncertainty; watershed management;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04381.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of a fitted parameter watershed model to address water quantity and quality management issues requires that it be calibrated under a wide range of hydrologic conditions. However, rarely does model calibration result in a unique parameter set. Parameter nonuniqueness can lead to predictive nonuniqueness. The extent of model predictive uncertainty should be investigated if management decisions are to be based on model projections. Using models built for four neighboring watersheds in the Neuse River Basin of North Carolina, the application of the automated parameter optimization software PEST in conjunction with the Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) is demonstrated. Parameter nonuniqueness is illustrated, and a method is presented for calculating many different sets of parameters, all of which acceptably calibrate a watershed model. A regularization methodology is discussed in which models for similar watersheds can be calibrated simultaneously. Using this method, parameter differences between watershed models can be minimized while maintaining fit between model outputs and field observations. In recognition of the fact that parameter nonuniqueness and predictive uncertainty are inherent to the modeling process, PEST's nonlinear predictive analysis functionality is then used to explore the extent of model predictive uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 265
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization [J].
Abbaspour, KC ;
Schulin, R ;
van Genuchten, MT .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2001, 24 (08) :827-841
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, J Hydrol, V10, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
[3]   WATER-QUALITY MODELING - A REVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
BECK, MB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (08) :1393-1442
[4]   Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling [J].
Beven, KJ .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (02) :203-213
[5]  
BICKNELL BR, 2001, HSPF USERS MANUAL
[6]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[7]  
Cooper VA, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V36, P53, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00461-7
[8]  
Doherty J., 2001, PEST ASP USERS MANUA
[9]  
Doherty J, 2001, PEST SURFACE WATER U
[10]  
Doherty J., 2002, ADDENDUM PEST MANUAL