Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation

被引:45
作者
Reddy, KS [1 ]
Johnston, TD [1 ]
Putnam, LA [1 ]
Isley, M [1 ]
Ranjan, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sect Transplantat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
liver transplantation; piggyback technique; veno-venous bypass;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.14040202.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The piggyback technique (PT), with preservation of the cava, is being used more frequently in adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The advantages of PT include hemodynamic stability during the anhepatic phase without a large-volume fluid infusion and obviating the need for veno-venous bypass (VVB). At our center, we changed our practice in July 1997 from the standard technique (ST) of OLT with routine use of VVB to PT and selective use of VVB. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the results with the two different practices, ST-routine VVB versus PT-selective VVB. Methods. Forty OLTs were performed during the period July 1995-July 1997 using ST-routine VVB (group I) and 36 during August 1997-December 1998 using PT-selective VVB (group II). The etiology of liver disease was similar in the two groups, with hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease accounting for half of the patients in each group. The UNOS status, age, sex, and percentage of patients with previous upper abdominal surgery were also similar between the two groups. Results. In the PT-selective VVB era (group II), 34/36 patients (94%) underwent OLT with PT and VVB was used for 8 (22%) patients. The decision to use VVB was elective for 3 patients (fulminant hepatic failure, 2; severe portal hypertension, 1) and urgent for 5 patients (hemodynamic instability during hepatectomy). The intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (mean +/- SD) was 15 +/- 12 units for group I and 9 +/- 8 units for group II (p = 0.023). Anastomosis time and total operating time (mean +/- SD) were 91 +/- 30 min and 9.5 +/- 3.2 h, respectively, for group I patients compared with 52 +/- 28 min and 7.6 +/- 1.6 h, respectively, for group II patients (p < 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). Median post-operative stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital were 5 and 17 d, respectively, for group I and 4 and 11 d, respectively, for group II (p = NS). Mean serum creatinine on day 3 was similar in the two groups. Median hospital charges for group I patients were $105 439 compared with S91 779 for group II patients (p = NS). The 1-year actuarial graft and patient survival rates were 78% and 82%, respectively, for group I, and 92% and 95%, respectively, for group II. Conclusions. PT is safe and can be performed in the majority of adult patients (> 90%) undergoing OLT. With the routine application of the piggyback procedure, the use of VVB has been reduced to 20% of OLTs at our center. The practice of piggyback technique with the selective use of VVB is associated with shorter anhepatic phase and total operating time, lower blood product use, a trend towards shorter hospital length of stay, and reduced hospital charges compared with standard technique of OLT with routine use of VVB.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Experience with the piggyback technique without caval occlusion in adult orthotopic liver transplantation [J].
Busque, S ;
Esquivel, CO ;
Concepcion, W ;
So, SKS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (01) :77-82
[2]   LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN MAN .I. OBSERVATIONS ON TECHNIQUE AND ORGANIZATION IN 5 CASES [J].
CALNE, RY ;
WILLIAMS, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 4 (5630) :535-+
[3]   Venovenous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: Routine or selective use? [J].
Chari, RS ;
Gan, TJ ;
Robertson, KM ;
Bass, K ;
Camargo, CA ;
Greig, PD ;
Clavien, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (06) :683-690
[4]   ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION WITH PRESERVATION OF THE CAVAL AND PORTAL FLOWS - TECHNIQUE AND RESULTS IN 62 CASES [J].
CHERQUI, D ;
LAUZET, JY ;
ROTMAN, N ;
DUVOUX, C ;
DHUMEAUX, D ;
JULIEN, M ;
FAGNIEZ, PL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 58 (07) :793-796
[5]  
ELLIS JE, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P777
[6]  
FLEITAS MG, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P842
[7]   Effect of venovenous bypass on perioperative renal function in liver transplantation: Results of a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Grande, L ;
Rimola, A ;
Cugat, E ;
Alvarez, L ;
GarciaValdecasas, JC ;
Taura, P ;
Beltran, J ;
Fuster, J ;
Lacy, AM ;
Gonzalez, FJ ;
Tabet, J ;
Cifuentes, A ;
Rull, R ;
Ramos, C ;
Visa, J ;
Rodes, J .
HEPATOLOGY, 1996, 23 (06) :1418-1428
[8]   Piggy-back versus conventional technique in liver transplantation: Report of a randomized trial [J].
Jovine, E ;
Mazziotti, A ;
Grazi, GL ;
Ercolani, G ;
Masetti, M ;
Morganti, M ;
Pierangeli, F ;
Begliomini, B ;
Mazzetti, PG ;
Rossi, R ;
Paladini, R ;
Cavallari, A .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 10 (02) :109-112
[9]  
KHOURY GF, 1990, EUR J ANAESTH, V7, P501
[10]   AIR-EMBOLISM ASSOCIATED WITH VENOVENOUS BYPASS DURING ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
KHOURY, GF ;
MANN, ME ;
POROT, MJ ;
ABDULRASOOL, IH ;
BUSUTTIL, RW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (05) :848-851