Risk perception: another look at the 'white male' effect

被引:67
作者
Palmer, CGS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
risk; risk perception; white male effect; worldviews; health risks; financial risks;
D O I
10.1080/1369857031000066014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
White males perceive the risks of health and technology hazards as low compared to white females and people of colour, a phenomenon termed the 'white male' effect. White males' low risk perceptions are associated with individualist and hierarchist worldviews as opposed to an egalitarian worldview. However, there is evidence that Asian males also perceive health and technology risks as low. Thus, the 'white male' effect may be more complex than originally thought. The current study investigated the 'white male' effect in a sample of US whites, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, and Taiwanese-Americans for health, technology, and financial activities. White males and Taiwanese-American males perceived health and technology risks as low compared to others and endorsed an individualist rather than an egalitarian worldview. Furthermore, African-Americans perceived health and technology risks as high compared to others and were more likely to endorse an egalitarian worldview. There was no evidence for a 'white male' or high risk effect for financial activities. Thus, 'white male' and high risk effects may be limited to the domain of health and technology risks. Because risk perceptions and worldviews of white males and Asian males are similar, 'low risk' effect may be a more suitable term than 'white male' effect.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 83
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   White, European, western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health [J].
Bhopal, R ;
Donaldson, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (09) :1303-1307
[2]  
Bord RJ, 1997, SOC SCI QUART, V78, P830
[3]   Fishing in urban New Jersey: Ethnicity affects information sources, perception, and compliance [J].
Burger, J ;
Pflugh, KK ;
Lurig, L ;
Von Hagen, LA ;
Von Hagen, S .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (02) :217-229
[4]   Evaluating the simplified conjoint expected risk model: Comparing the use of objective and subjective information [J].
Carlstrom, LK ;
Woodward, JA ;
Palmer, CGS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (03) :385-392
[5]   Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest [J].
Ellis, RJ ;
Thompson, F .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (04) :885-897
[6]   Public perception of the risk of blood transfusion [J].
Finucane, ML ;
Slovic, P ;
Mertz, CK .
TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (08) :1017-1022
[7]   Gender, race, and perceived risk: the 'white male' effect [J].
Finucane, ML ;
Slovic, P ;
Mertz, CK ;
Flynn, J ;
Satterfield, TA .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2000, 2 (02) :159-172
[8]   GENDER, RACE, AND PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISKS [J].
FLYNN, J ;
SLOVIC, P ;
MERTZ, CK .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1101-1108
[9]   DIMENSIONS OF RISK PERCEPTION FOR FINANCIAL AND HEALTH RISKS [J].
HOLTGRAVE, DR ;
WEBER, EU .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (05) :553-558
[10]   Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer [J].
Hughes, C ;
Lerman, C ;
Lustbader, E .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 40 (01) :25-35