Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma

被引:171
作者
Li, HC
Cao, DC
Liu, Y
Hou, YF
Wu, J
Lu, JS
Di, GH
Liu, G
Li, FM
Ou, ZL
Jie, C
Shen, ZZ
Shao, ZM
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst Canc, Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Magang Hosp, Dept Surg, Maanshan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breast carcinoma; lymph node-negative; matrix metalloproteinases; prognostic factor;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-004-1200-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Twenty-five to thirty percent of patients with node-negative breast cancer are expected to relapse following surgery, therefore great efforts have been made to identify new prognostic markers that could be useful in de. ning patients for additional therapy. The expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 has been associated with high potential of metastasis in several human carcinomas including breast cancer. In the present study we examined the prognostic value of immunoreactive MMP-2/MMP-9 protein in 270 consecutive lymph node negative cases who received radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy. Among the patients, 211 cases received adjuvant endocrine therapy and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. Using immunohistochemical assay, we found that 56.7% of the resected tumors were positive for MMP-2 whereas 59.6% of the samples were positive for MMP-9. chi(2) test demonstrated a significant direct association between MMP-2 and MMP-9 ( p < 0.001); positive immunostaining of MMP-2 was significantly related to higher tumor grade ( p < 0.001) and larger tumor size (p = 0.012); positive immunostaining of MMP-9 was significantly related to higher tumor grade (p = 0.002). In univariate analysis, using Cox-proportional hazard model we found MMP-2, MMP-9 and the co-expression of MMPs ( MMP2/MMP9) were significantly associated with patients' relapse free survival (p = 0.016, 0.015 and 0.013 respectively) but not overall survival (p = 0.122, 0.320 and 0.091 respectively). Log-rank test also showed that MMP-2, MMP-9 or the co-expression of MMP2/MMP9 was unfavorable prognostic factor for relapse free survival but not overall survival. In subgroup analysis, we found MMPs were more prognostic for patients with no adjuvant treatment than for patients with adjuvant therapy. In multivariate analysis, using Cox-proportional hazard model we found co-expression of MMPs, larger tumor size and higher tumor grade were unfavorable for relapse free survival (p = 0.038, 0.007 and 0.015 for each). We concluded that MMP-2 and MMP-2 are unfavorable prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. They might be potential predictive factor for adjuvant systemic therapy. The co-expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 has significantly prognostic value in node-negative patients.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 85
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baker EA, 2002, J CLIN PATHOL-MOL PA, V55, P300
[2]   Matrix metalloproteinases, their tissue inhibitors and colorectal cancer staging [J].
Baker, EA ;
Bergin, FG ;
Leaper, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (09) :1215-1221
[3]   Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis [J].
Chambers, AF ;
Matrisian, LM .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (17) :1260-1270
[4]  
Curran S, 1999, J PATHOL, V189, P300, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199911)189:3<300::AID-PATH456>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-C
[6]   LAMININ RECEPTORS, COLLAGENASE-IV AND PROGNOSIS IN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERS [J].
DAIDONE, MG ;
SILVESTRINI, R ;
DERRICO, A ;
DIFRONZO, G ;
BENINI, E ;
MANCINI, AM ;
GARBISA, S ;
LIOTTA, LA ;
GRIGIONI, WF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 48 (04) :529-532
[7]   Metalloproteinases: role in breast carcinogenesis, invasion and metastasis [J].
Duffy, MJ ;
Maguire, TM ;
Hill, A ;
McDermott, E ;
O'Higgins, N .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2000, 2 (04) :252-257
[8]  
Duffy MJ, 1998, INT J ONCOL, V12, P1343
[9]   The biochemistry of metastasis [J].
Duffy, MJ .
ADVANCES IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 32, 1996, 32 :135-166
[10]   DO PROTEASES PLAY A ROLE IN CANCER INVASION AND METASTASIS [J].
DUFFY, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 23 (05) :583-589