Comparative patterns of predation by cougars and recolonizing wolves in Montana's Madison Range

被引:65
作者
Atwood, Todd C. [1 ]
Gese, Eric M. [1 ]
Kunkel, Kyran E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr,Wildlife Serv, US Dept Agr,Anim Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
antipredator behavior; canid; cougar; felid; habitat; refugia; risk; wolf; GLACIER NATIONAL-PARK; WHITE-TAILED DEER; PREY SELECTION; TEMPORAL PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR; VIGILANCE; RISK; SIZE; SURVIVAL; GAZELLES;
D O I
10.2193/2006-102
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator. However, when a recolonizing predator enters an already complex predator-prey system, specific antipredator behaviors may conflict and avoidance of one predator may enhance vulnerability to another. We studied the patterns of prey selection by recolonizing wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor) in response to prey resource selection in the northern Madison Range, Montana, USA. Elk (Cervus elaphus) were the primary prey for wolves, and male deer (Odocoileus hemionus) were the primary prey for cougars, but elk made up an increasingly greater proportion of cougar kills annually. Although both predators preyed disproportionately on male elk, wolves were most likely to prey on males in poor physical condition. Although we found that the predators partitioned hunting habitats, structural complexity at wolf kill sites increased over time, whereas complexity of cougar kill sites decreased. We concluded that shifts by prey to structurally complex refugia were attempts by formerly naive prey to lessen predation risk from wolves; nevertheless, shifting to more structurally complex refugia might have made prey more vulnerable to cougars. After a change in predator exposure, use of refugia may represent a compromise to minimize overall risk. As agencies formulate management strategies relative to wolf recolonization, the potential for interactive predation effects (i.e., facilitation or antagonism) should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1106
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U MONTANA MIS
[3]   Are macroinvertebrate communities influenced by seagrass structural complexity? [J].
Attrill, MJ ;
Strong, JA ;
Rowden, AA .
ECOGRAPHY, 2000, 23 (01) :114-121
[4]  
Atwood T.C., 2006, PhD Thesis.
[5]  
BEGERUD AT, 1981, ALCES, V17, P30
[6]   Recolonizing carnivores and naive prey: Conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions [J].
Berger, J ;
Swenson, JE ;
Persson, IL .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5506) :1036-1039
[7]  
Bergerud A.T., 1983, CAN J ZOOL, V62, P1566
[8]   DISPLACEMENT AND DISPERSION OF PARTURIENT CARIBOU AT CALVING AS ANTIPREDATOR TACTICS [J].
BERGERUD, AT ;
PAGE, RE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1987, 65 (07) :1597-1606
[9]   Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be wary [J].
Blumstein, DT ;
Mari, M ;
Daniel, JC ;
Ardron, JG ;
Griffin, AS ;
Evans, CS .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 5 :87-93
[10]   The ecology of fear:: Optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions [J].
Brown, JS ;
Laundré, JW ;
Gurung, M .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1999, 80 (02) :385-399