Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis

被引:68
作者
Cheung, Yun-Chung [1 ,4 ]
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei [2 ,4 ]
Lo, Yung-Feng [2 ,4 ]
Ueng, Shir-Hwa [3 ]
Huang, Pei-Chin [1 ]
Chen, Shin-Chih [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Chang Gung Mem Hosp Tao Yuan & Linkuo, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, 5 Fuxing St, Guishan Township, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkuo, Dept Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkuo, Dept Pathol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Med Collage, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Mammography; Dual-energy Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography; Breast cancer; Breast microcalcification; Surgical planning; FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; TOMOSYNTHESIS; DESCRIPTORS; CARCINOMA; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3904-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM) for evaluation of suspicious malignant microcalcifications. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six DE-CESMs were reviewed from 2012-2013, 59 cases fulfilled the following criteria and were enrolled for analysis: (1) suspicious malignant microcalcifications (BI-RADS 4) on mammogram, (2) no related mass, (3) with pathological diagnoses. The microcalcification morphology and associated enhancement were reviewed to analyse the accuracy of the diagnosis and cancer size measurements versus the results of pathology. Results Of the 59 microcalcifications, 22 were diagnosed as cancers, 19 were atypical lesions and 18 were benign lesions. Twenty (76.9 %) cancers, three (11.55 %) atypia and three (11.55 %) benign lesions revealed enhancement. The true-positive rate of intermediate- and high-concern microcalcifications was significantly higher than that of low-concern lesions (93.75 % vs. 50 %). Overall, the diagnostic sensitivity of enhancement was 90.9 %, with 83.78 % specificity, 76.92 % positive predictive value, 93.94 % negative predictive value and 86.4 % accuracy. Performance was good (AUC = 0.87) according to a ROC curve and cancer size correlation with a mean difference of 0.05 cm on a Bland-Altman plot. Conclusions DE-CESM provides additional enhancement information for diagnosing breast microcalcifications and measuring cancer sizes with high correlation to surgicohistology.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1089
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: Results of a multicenter trial [J].
Bazzocchi, M ;
Zuiani, C ;
Panizza, P ;
Del Frate, C ;
Soldano, F ;
Isola, M ;
Sardanelli, F ;
Giuseppetti, GM ;
Simonetti, G ;
Lattanzio, V ;
Del Maschio, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) :1723-1732
[2]   The Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS Microcalcification Descriptors and Final Assessment Categories [J].
Bent, Chris K. ;
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
D'Orsi, Carl J. ;
Sayre, James W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05) :1378-1383
[3]   Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 [J].
Berg, WA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (05) :1225-1228
[4]   Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy [J].
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Ochsner, Jennifer E. ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. ;
Fine, Jason P. ;
Salkowski, Lonie R. ;
Rubin, Daniel L. ;
Sisney, Gale A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (02) :388-395
[5]   Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Lin, Yu-Ching ;
Wan, Yung-Liang ;
Yeow, Kee-Min ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Chang, Chee-Jen .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) :2394-2403
[6]   Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media [J].
Diekmann, F ;
Diekmann, S ;
Jeunehomme, F ;
Muller, S ;
Hamm, B ;
Bick, U .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (07) :397-404
[7]   Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography [J].
Diekmann, Felix ;
Freyer, Martin ;
Diekmann, Susanne ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Poellinger, Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) :112-121
[8]  
Dromain Clarisse, 2006, AJR Am J Roentgenol, V187, pW528, DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.1944
[9]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Diekmann, Felix ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Koomen, Marcia ;
Hendrick, R. Edward ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Toledano, Alicia .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (03)
[10]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Muller, Serge ;
Rimareix, Francoise ;
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Balleyguier, Corinne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :565-574