Attentional orienting towards smoking-related stimuli

被引:86
作者
Hogarth, LC [1 ]
Mogg, K
Bradley, BP
Duka, T
Dickinson, A
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Biol Sci, Expt Psychol Lab, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Psychol, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Expt Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
来源
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2003年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
incentive; salience; attention; smoking; addiction; cue reactivity; human;
D O I
10.1097/00008877-200303000-00007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to incentive salience theory, conditioned stimuli (CS+) associated with drug reinforcement acquire the capacity to elicit a conditioned attentional orienting response, which controls drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviour. We sought evidence for this proposal by measuring visual attentional orienting towards smoking pictures presented briefly in the periphery of the visual field, versus control pictures likewise presented, in smokers versus non-smokers. In each trial, smokers and non-smokers responded manually to a dot probe stimulus that appeared in a location previously occupied by either a smoking picture or a control picture. Attentional bias scores were calculated by subtracting the median reaction time (RT) in the former condition from the median RT in the latter condition. In two experiments, light-smokers (smokers of fewer than 20 cigarettes/day) produced a mean bias score that was significantly greater than that of heavy-smokers (smokers of 20 or more cigarettes/day) and non-smokers. In addition, when smokers from the two experiments were pooled, a significant quadratic relationship was found between cigarettes/day and the attentional bias for the smoking stimuli. These findings are consistent with incentive salience theories and dual-process theories of addiction.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Is smoking automatic? Demands of smoking behavior on attentional resources [J].
Baxter, BW ;
Hinson, RE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 110 (01) :59-66
[3]   REINFORCEMENT, EXPECTANCY, AND LEARNING [J].
BOLLES, RC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1972, 79 (05) :394-&
[4]  
BRADLEY BP, 2003, IN PRESS PSYCHOL ADD
[5]   Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research [J].
Carter, BL ;
Tiffany, ST .
ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (03) :327-340
[6]   SIZE OF THE ATTENTIONAL FOCUS AND EFFICIENCY OF PROCESSING [J].
CASTIELLO, U ;
UMILTA, C .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1990, 73 (03) :195-209
[7]   The use of a dual task procedure for the assessment of cognitive effort associated with cigarette craving [J].
CepedaBenito, A ;
Tiffany, ST .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 127 (02) :155-163
[8]   THE NATURE AND FUNCTION OF INTEROCEPTIVE SIGNALS TO FEED - TOWARD INTEGRATION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AND LEARNING PERSPECTIVES [J].
DAVIDSON, TL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (04) :640-657
[9]   EFFECT OF STRENGTH OF DRIVE DETERMINED BY A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR APPETITIVE CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF RATS [J].
DEBOLD, RC ;
MILLER, NE ;
JENSEN, DD .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 59 (01) :102-&
[10]   MOTIVATIONAL CONTROL AFTER EXTENDED INSTRUMENTAL TRAINING [J].
DICKINSON, A ;
BALLEINE, B ;
WATT, A ;
GONZALEZ, F ;
BOAKES, RA .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 23 (02) :197-206