Local labor market flexibility in a perceived low migration country: The case of French labor markets

被引:25
作者
Detang-Dessendre, Cecile [1 ]
Partridge, Mark D. [2 ]
Piguet, Virginie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRA, Cesaer UMR1041, AgroSup Dijon, BP87999, F-21079 Dijon, France
[2] Ohio State Univ, AED Econ, 2120 Fyffe Rd, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Internal migration; Labor market flexibility; Rural urban disparities; Local labor market; INTERNAL MIGRATION; UNEMPLOYMENT; GROWTH; WAGE; EQUILIBRIUM; RIGIDITIES; EUROPE; SHIFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.03.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Local labor markets are most flexible and aggregate natural unemployment is reduced when there is sufficient interregional economic migration to ensure that workers are reallocated from declining to expanding regions. Local European labor markets have generally been viewed as not as flexible as those in North America, leading to greater fluctuations in local wages, labor force participation and unemployment rates, and smaller changes in local employment as economic shocks are primarily experienced by the local area's original residents. France is an interesting case. French gross migration rates-though perhaps relatively low-are higher today than a generation ago. Using a host of novel identification approaches and French employment zone data dating back to the early 1980s, we investigate whether these changes correspond to economic migration that would increase labor market flexibility. Our results detect surprising amounts of economic migration in that most new jobs are eventually taken by new migrants or outside commuters. We then reconcile these somewhat surprising findings with the still relatively low contemporary French interregional gross migration rates, concluding that other structural impediments besides relative local labor market inflexibility are behind relatively poor labor market performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 103
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abildtrup J., 2014, LOCAL POPULATION EMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 20065 NBER
[3]  
ARCHIBALD GC, 1969, AM ECON REV, V59, P124
[4]  
Baccaïni B, 2007, POPULATION, V62, P143
[5]   THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE-BASED VERSUS PLACE-NEUTRAL APPROACHES [J].
Barca, Fabrizio ;
McCann, Philip ;
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres .
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (01) :134-152
[6]  
Bartik T.J., 1991, Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?
[7]   WHO BENEFITS FROM LOCAL JOB GROWTH - MIGRANTS OR THE ORIGINAL RESIDENTS [J].
BARTIK, TJ .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1993, 27 (04) :297-311
[8]  
Beffa J.L., 2005, COLLECTION RAPPORTS
[9]  
BLANCHARD OJ, 1992, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[10]  
Blanchflower D.G., 2013, CAGE CHATHAM HOUSE S, V10