Dementia diagnostic guidelines: Methodologies, results, and implementation costs

被引:29
作者
Beck, C
Cody, M
Souder, E
Zhang, ML
Small, GW
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Geriatr, Cognit Impairment Div, Coll Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Res, Cent Arkansas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Aging, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
dementia; diagnosis; practice guidelines; referral; Alzheimer's disease;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02590.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To facilitate the diagnostic process for dementia. Five guidelines and four consensus statements on specific diagnostic,recommendations, specialist referral recommendations, and costs of recommended diagnostic procedures were compared and summarized. DATA SOURCES AND SELECTION: A MEDLINE search from 1984 to 1999 and queries to experts yielded 14 guidelines and consensus statements that addressed the diagnosis of dementia. Only nine documents which had national or international scopes were reviewed. METHODS: Comparisons were made on the specific diagnostic criteria for patient history, clinical examination, functional assessment, laboratory tests, neuroimaging, and other diagnostic tests, as well as specialist referral recommendations and costs for the recommended diagnostic procedures. The first three authors reviewed independently each document and completed a table on specific recommendations in each document. To settle disagreements about specific recommendations, they discussed them until they reached a consensus. To interpret the intent of vague statements, they used their best judgment. RESULTS: The documents differed in content, recommendations, and development methodology. They were based on either expert opinion or scientific evidence, or both. Although the nine documents were nearly unanimous in several recommendations, including assessing the presenting problem, taking a medical history, conducting physical and neurological examinations, and assessing the patient's mental and cognitive status, considerable differences in recommendations were common. Such differences led to large differentials in the estimated costs (range, $190 to $2,001) for recommended diagnostic assessments. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to diagnostic recommendations for dementia may induce greater consistency among guidelines and consensus statements. The current approach leads to considerable variability in recommendations and estimated costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1203
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   SCREENING LABORATORY EVALUATION IN PSYCHIATRIC-PATIENTS - A REVIEW [J].
ANFINSON, TJ ;
KATHOL, RG .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 14 (04) :248-257
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, TASK FORC NOM STAT D
[3]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSIS MANAGEMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], GER ASS RES GUID
[5]   HM-PAO (CERETEC) SPECT brain scanning in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease [J].
Bergman, H ;
Chertkow, H ;
Wolfson, C ;
Stern, J ;
Rush, C ;
Whitehead, V ;
Dixon, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (01) :15-20
[6]  
BERNSTEIN MJ, 1987, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V258, P3411
[7]   Evaluation of dementia: A systematic study of the usefulness of the American Academy of Neurology's Practice Parameters [J].
Chui, H ;
Zhang, Q .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) :925-935
[8]  
CLARFIELD AM, 1991, CAN MED ASSOC J, V144, P851
[9]   DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF DEMENTIA [J].
COREYBLOOM, J ;
THAL, LJ ;
GALASKO, D ;
FOLSTEIN, M ;
DRACHMAN, D ;
RASKIND, M ;
LANSKA, DJ .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :211-218
[10]  
COSTA PTJ, 1996, AHCPR PUBLICATION