Assessing Joint Distributions with Isoprobability Contours

被引:7
作者
Abbas, Ali E. [1 ]
Budescu, David V. [2 ,3 ]
Gu, Yuhong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Engn, Dept Ind & Enterprise Syst Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, Dept Psychol, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
isoprobability contours; joint probability elicitation; probability encoding; correlation; dependence; ILLUSORY CORRELATION; DECISION-ANALYSIS; JUDGMENTS; CONTINGENCY; DEPENDENCE; PERCEPTION; VARIABLES; COPULAS;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1100.1161
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
We present a new method for constructing joint probability distributions of continuous random variables using isoprobability contours-sets of points with the same joint cumulative probability. This approach reduces the joint probability assessment into a one-dimensional cumulative probability assessment using a sequence of binary choices between various combinations of the variables of interest. The approach eliminates the need to assess directly the dependence, or association, between the variables. We discuss properties of isoprobability contours and methods for their assessment in practice. We also report results of a study in which subjects assessed the 50th percentile isoprobability contour of the joint distribution of weight and height. We use the data to show how to use the assessed contours to construct the joint distribution and to infer (indirectly) the dependence between the variables.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1011
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Entropy methods for joint distributions in decision analysis [J].
Abbas, AE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 53 (01) :146-159
[2]
Abbas AE., 2008, Decision Analysis, V5, P190, DOI DOI 10.1287/DECA.1080.0126
[3]
THE JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY AND THE NATURE OF THE RESPONSE ALTERNATIVES [J].
ALLAN, LG ;
JENKINS, HM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1980, 34 (01) :1-11
[4]
ASSESSMENT OF COVARIATION BY HUMANS AND ANIMALS - THE JOINT INFLUENCE OF PRIOR EXPECTATIONS AND CURRENT SITUATIONAL INFORMATION [J].
ALLOY, LB ;
TABACHNIK, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (01) :112-149
[5]
[Anonymous], 2006, SIGNIFICANCE
[6]
[Anonymous], JUDGEMENT CHOICE
[7]
[Anonymous], 1991, EXPERTS UNCERTAINTY
[8]
[Anonymous], 1998, STATISTICIAN
[9]
ESTIMATES OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN 2 DICHOTOMOUS-VARIABLES [J].
ARKES, HR ;
HARKNESS, AR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1983, 112 (01) :117-135
[10]
PERCEPTION OF CORRELATION REEXAMINED [J].
BEYTHMAROM, R .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1982, 10 (06) :511-519