An eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux parametrization for dry and shallow cumulus convection

被引:153
作者
Soares, PMM
Miranda, PMA
Siebesma, AP
Teixeira, J
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Ctr Geofis, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] USN, Res Lab, Monterey, CA USA
关键词
boundary layer; clouds; turbulence;
D O I
10.1256/qj.03.223
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Recently, a new consistent way of parametrizing simultaneously local and non-local turbulent transport for the convective atmospheric boundary layer has been proposed and tested for the clear boundary layer. This approach assumes that in the convective boundary layer the subgrid-scale fluxes result from two different mixing scales: small eddies, that are parametrized by an eddy-diffusivity approach, and thermals, which are represented by a mass-flux contribution. Since the interaction between the cloud layer and the underlying sub-cloud layer predominantly takes place through strong updraughts, this approach offers an interesting avenue of establishing a unified description of the turbulent transport in the cumulus-topped boundary layer. This paper explores the possibility of such a new approach for the cumulus-topped boundary layer. In the sub-cloud and cloud layers, the mass-flux term represents the effect of strong updraughts. These are modelled by a simple entraining parcel, which determines the mean properties of the strong updraughts, the boundary-layer height, the lifting condensation level and cloud top. The residual smaller-scale turbulent transport is parametrized with an eddy-diffusivity approach that uses a turbulent kinetic energy closure. The new scheme is implemented and tested in the research model MesoNH.
引用
收藏
页码:3365 / 3383
页数:19
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P 14 S BOUND LAY TUR
  • [2] ARAKAWA A, 1974, J ATMOS SCI, V31, P674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:IOACCE>2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] An evaluation of neutral and convective planetary boundary-layer parameterizations relative to large eddy simulations
    Ayotte, KW
    Sullivan, PP
    Andren, A
    Doney, SC
    Holtslag, AAM
    Large, WG
    Mcwilliams, JC
    Moeng, CH
    Otte, MJ
    Tribbia, JJ
    Wyngaard, JC
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1996, 79 (1-2) : 131 - 175
  • [5] Bechtold P, 2001, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V127, P869, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712757309
  • [6] BECHTOLD P, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P455, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0455:MOTWCW>2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] BETTS AK, 1975, J ATMOS SCI, V32, P1934, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1934:PIOTWC>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] BETTS AK, 1976, J ATMOS SCI, V33, P2363, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2363:MSLSAI>2.0.CO