Sharing the "cost" of multicast trees: An axiomatic analysis

被引:43
作者
Herzog, S [1 ]
Shenker, S
Estrin, D
机构
[1] IPHighway, San Jose, CA 95110 USA
[2] Xerox Corp, Palo Alto Res Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Dept Comp Sci, ISI, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cost allocation; cost sharing; Internet economics; multicast; network accounting; quality of service (QoS);
D O I
10.1109/90.650144
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Given the need to provide users with reasonable feedback about the "costs" their network usage incurs and the increasingly commercial nature of the Internet, we believe that the allocation of cost among users will play an important role in future networks, This paper discusses cost allocation in the context of multicast flows, The question we discuss is this, When a single data flow is shared among many receivers, how does one split the cost of that flow among the receivers? Multicast routing increases network efficiency by using a single shared delivery tree, We address the issue of how these savings are allocated among the various members of the multicast group, We first consider an axiomatic approach to the problem, analyzing the implications of different distributive notions on the resulting allocations, We then consider a "one-pass" mechanism to implement such allocation schemes and investigate the family of allocation schemes such mechanisms can support.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 860
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RFC1075
[2]  
[Anonymous], RFC1584
[3]  
BALLARDIE AJ, 1993, J ACM SIGCOMM 93 AUG
[4]  
BRAUN HW, 1993, P IEEE SICON SINGAPO
[5]  
CLARK D, 1992, P AM SIGCOMM AUG
[6]  
CLARK D, P 23 ANN TEL POL RES
[7]   Pricing in Computer Networks: Motivation, Formulation, and Example [J].
Cocchi, Ron ;
Shenker, Scott ;
Estrin, Deborah ;
Zhang, Lixia .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 1993, 1 (06) :614-627
[8]  
DEERING S, 1990, ACM T COMPUT SYST, P85
[9]  
DEERING S, 1994, P ACM SIGCOMM
[10]   Traffic-based cost allocation in a network [J].
Henriet, D ;
Moulin, H .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 27 (02) :332-345