Effect of taxon sampling, character weighting, and combined data on the interpretation of relationships among the heterokont algae

被引:26
作者
Goertzen, LR [1 ]
Theriot, EC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
bootstrap support; Chromista; combined data; heterokont algae; molecular phylogeny; rbcL; ribosomal DNA; stramenopiles; taxon sampling;
D O I
10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.01238.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Nuclear ribosomal small subunit and chloroplast rbc L sequence data for heterokont algae and potential outgroup taxa were analyzed separately and together using maximum parsimony. A series of taxon sampling and character weighting experiments was performed. Traditional classes (e.g. diatoms, Phaeophyceae, etc.) were monophyletic in most analyses of either data set and in analyses of combined data. Relationships among classes and of heterokont algae to outgroup taxa were sensitive to taxon sampling. Bootstrap (BS) values were not always predictive of stability of nodes in taxon sampling experiments or between analyses of different data sets. Reweighting sites by the rescaled consistency index artificially inflates BS values in the analysis of rbc L data. Inclusion of the third codon position from rbc L enhanced signal despite the superficial appearance of mutational saturation. Incongruence between data sets was largely due to placement of a few problematic taxa, and so data were combined. BS values for the combined analysis were much higher than for analyses of each data set alone, although combining data did not improve support for heterokont monophyly.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / U4
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ALBERT VA, 1994, MODELS PHYLOGENY REC, P249
[2]  
Allard MW, 1999, CLADISTICS, V15, P75
[3]   Phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA from members of the Chrysophyceae [J].
Andersen, RA ;
Van de Peer, Y ;
Potter, D ;
Sexton, JP ;
Kawachi, M ;
LaJeunesse, T .
PROTIST, 1999, 150 (01) :71-84
[4]   A cyanobacterial gene in nonphotosynthetic protists - An early chloroplast acquisition in eukaryotes? [J].
Andersson, JO ;
Roger, AJ .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :115-119
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PHYLOGENETIC ANAL US
[6]   Phaeothamniophyceae classis nova: A new lineage of chromophytes based upon photosynthetic pigments, rbcL sequence analysis and ultrastructure [J].
Bailey, JC ;
Bidigare, RR ;
Christensen, SJ ;
Andersen, RA .
PROTIST, 1998, 149 (03) :245-263
[7]   AGAINST CONSENSUS [J].
BARRETT, M ;
DONOGHUE, MJ ;
SOBER, E .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1991, 40 (04) :486-493
[8]  
Björklund M, 1999, CLADISTICS, V15, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00261.x
[9]   Combined and separate analyses of morphological and molecular data in the plant family Rubiaceae [J].
Bremer, B .
CLADISTICS, 1996, 12 (01) :21-40
[10]   Quantification of homoplasy for nucleotide transitions and transversions and a reexamination of assumptions in weighted phylogenetic analysis [J].
Broughton, RE ;
Stanley, SE ;
Durrett, RT .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2000, 49 (04) :617-627